2016
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting standard-dose PET image from low-dose PET and multimodal MR images using mapping-based sparse representation

Abstract: Positron emission tomography (PET) has been widely used in clinical diagnosis for diseases and disorders. To obtain high-quality PET images requires a standard-dose radionuclide (tracer) injection into the human body, which inevitably increases risk of radiation exposure. One possible solution to this problem is to predict the standard-dose PET image from its low-dose counterpart and its corresponding multimodal magnetic resonance (MR) images. Inspired by the success of patch-based sparse representation (SR) i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation often requires the input of the tracer-free MRI scan and relies on the sparse learning technique. For example, in [14], the mapping-based sparse representation (m-SR) was adopted for SPET image reconstruction. To speed up the process, the patch-selection-based dictionary construction method was used to build a relatively small but representative dictionary, which can heavily reduce the processing time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimation often requires the input of the tracer-free MRI scan and relies on the sparse learning technique. For example, in [14], the mapping-based sparse representation (m-SR) was adopted for SPET image reconstruction. To speed up the process, the patch-selection-based dictionary construction method was used to build a relatively small but representative dictionary, which can heavily reduce the processing time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-modality data has been proven to provide complementary and effective information for increasing the quality of each single modality [13, 14]. It is shown in the literature that the anatomical or the structural information (e.g., from CT or MRI [15, 16]) contributes to better SPET image quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our method with the following state-of-the-art multi-modality based PET estimation methods: (1) mapping based sparse representation method (m-SR) [2], (2) tripled dictionary learning method (t-DL) [4], (3) multi-level CCA method (m-CCA) [5], and (4) auto-context CNN method [3]. The averaged PSNR are given in Fig.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-reconstruction methods that use image filtering or sparse methods to predict standard-dose PET from low-dose PET 11 have also succeeded in denoising PET images. Common image filtering techniques, such as nonlocal means and block matching, are well established in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%