2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00234-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting runoff-induced pesticide input in agricultural sub-catchment surface waters: linking catchment variables and contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential of runoff as a route of entry for pesticides and sediments input from agricultural fields into streams has been illustrated in a number of other studies (e.g. Wauchope, 1978;Readman et al, 1992;DeLorenzo et al, 1999;McDonald et al, 1999;Werner et al, 2000;Schulz, 2001;Schulz et al, 2001;Dabrowski et al, 2002b). Schulz (2001) and Nakano et al (2004) provide an overview of field studies undertaken in temperate latitudes that establish a relationship between runoff events and increased total suspended sediment and pesticide levels in a river by monitoring their residues in river water or sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of runoff as a route of entry for pesticides and sediments input from agricultural fields into streams has been illustrated in a number of other studies (e.g. Wauchope, 1978;Readman et al, 1992;DeLorenzo et al, 1999;McDonald et al, 1999;Werner et al, 2000;Schulz, 2001;Schulz et al, 2001;Dabrowski et al, 2002b). Schulz (2001) and Nakano et al (2004) provide an overview of field studies undertaken in temperate latitudes that establish a relationship between runoff events and increased total suspended sediment and pesticide levels in a river by monitoring their residues in river water or sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a number of geographical and physico-chemical factors influence the movement of pesticides into surface waters, the quantity and rate of application of pesticides used (and by implication the relative application rate) in an area is the most important indicator of the potential for contamination of non-target environments. 30 In this respect, the maps provide important information, not only in terms of estimated application rates, but also in terms of identifying where in the country specific pesticides are most likely being applied. Integrating these data together with geographical data of slope, soil and climate in a GIS platform can significantly improve our ability to identify ground-and surface water resources at risk of pesticide exposure through leaching and run-off.…”
Section: Application Of Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of heavy metal and pesticide pollution and nutrient loading have been the subject of a variety of studies in the region, most notably using longitudinal investigations of freshwater systems or comparable kinds of space for time substitutions, although monitoring of abiotic variables stretches back to the early twentieth century (Davies & Day 1998;Dallas et al 1999;Dabrowski et al 2002;de Villiers 2007;de Villiers & Thiart 2007;Reinecke & Reinecke 2007;Chakona et al 2009;de Villiers & Mkwelo 2009 (de Villiers & Thiart 2007). A substantial programme of monitoring of river health in the country has been undertaken at least since the 1990s, including assessments both of abiotic variables and of changes in biota typically using a family-level, invertebratebased scoring system (the South African scoring system or SASS, Davies & Day 1998;Dallas et al 1999;Roux 2001).…”
Section: Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%