The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent a group of 88 subjects, who were sentenced to the Forest Camp in the early seventies, remained law abiding in the ten years which followed their release.In addition to analyzing recidivist patterns, the study attempted to identify which variables were associated with subsequent recidivist and non-recidivist behavior and relate those findings to previous studies in the literature. These criteria are consistent with those established in other research in the literature (England, 1955;Moberg, 1972;Mandel et al, 1965;Brown, 1978). All of these studies agree that conviction and subsequent confinement are the most definitive criteria of recidivism.Of the 88 subjects, 37 had one or more convictions for which they were sentenced to either jail or prison; while 51 had remained law abiding for a 10 -12 year period. Thus, the recidivism rate for this group of subjects was 42%.Of the 37 recidivist subjects, 18 had not had a conviction within the last five years. In addition, 26 (70%) of the recidivist group successfully completed the probationary period which followed their release from the Forest Camp.Therefore, most of the recidivist activity occurred in a time period immediately following termination of probation.The second part of the analysis compared the personal characteristics and criminal history for a subset of 47 subjects for whom complete files could be located. Of the 47 subjects, 20 met the criteria of recidivist and 27 were nonrecidivist. Both univariate and multivariate techniques were utilized to test for differences between the two groups. The univariate analysis showed that the groups differed signifi-3 cantly on only two variables; marital status and parents economic status. However, when the multivariate technique of stepwise discriminant analysis was applied, the discriminant model which emerged contained five variables which discriminated between the recidivist and non-recidivist groups.These were: 1) Age at time sent to the Forest Camp; 2)Number of prior arrests; 3) Number of prior convictions; 4) Personality disorder; and 5) Drug use.Therefore, the non-recidivist group could be generally differentiated from the recidivist group in that they were:1) Younger by an average age of 21.6 months when entering the Forest Camp; 2) Had a lesser degree of criminal history than the recidivist group, as measured by the number of prior arrests and convictions, but had 18% more convictions per prior arrest than did the recidivist group; 3) Had more involvement with drugs, but fewer instances of documented personality disorders. In addition, the non-recidivist group served sentences which were on the average one-third longer than the recidivist subjects. The longer sentences appear to have had some degree of effectiveness particularly if drug use was involved.