1984
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.52.2.280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting prison adjustment with structured personality inventories.

Abstract: This study investigated the degree to which individual scales and multivariate combinations of scales on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) could predict criteria of adjustment in prison. Subjects were 1,313 inmates at a Federal Correctional Institution who were admitted over a 2-year period. Two thirds of the sample was used as a derivation sample and one third was used for cross-validation. The criteria of adjustment were ratings made by cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychological test results have not been found to be good predictors of institutional behaviors and inmate adjustment (see the review by Carbonell, Moorhead, & Megargee, 1984). Psychological or psychiatric labels that are applied to inmates, generally, have also been found to be wanting in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Psychological test results have not been found to be good predictors of institutional behaviors and inmate adjustment (see the review by Carbonell, Moorhead, & Megargee, 1984). Psychological or psychiatric labels that are applied to inmates, generally, have also been found to be wanting in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Carbonell, Megargee, & Moorhead (1984) described statistically signi®cant ®ndings in using the MMPI to forecast prison adjustment, but cautioned that the accompanying correlation coecients were too low to support using the instrument in individual decision making. Quay (1984) obtained MMPI pro®les on 1824 inmates in U.S. federal prison who had been assigned to one of ®ve inmate classi®cation groups based on characteristic behaviors determined by record review and institutional observation.…”
Section: Self-report Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…MMPI pro®le patterns have been observed to change over time so that an inmate's corresponding Megargee classi®cation may shift (Clements, 1996;Craig, 1996), further limiting predictive usefulness of the MMPI in evaluating long term violence potential. MMPI ®ndings thus should not be considered to represent immutable personality characteristics.…”
Section: Self-report Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Inmates who demonstrated the poorest coping skills in the community are more likely to be single, impulsive, have a history of psychological problems, and a lengthier prior record (Zamble & Porporino, 1988). Not coincidentally, these same factors emerge as risk factors for misconduct in the institution (Adams, 1992;Bonta & Nanckivell, 1980;Carbonell & Moorehead, 1984;Flanagan, 1980Flanagan, , 1983Lombardo, 1982;Toch, Adams, & Greene, 1987).…”
Section: Deviant Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%