2019
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/xma4f
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting pragmatic cue integration in adults’ and children’s inferences about novel word meanings

Abstract: Language is learned in complex social settings where listeners must reconstruct speakers’ intentend meanings from context. To navigate this challenge, children can use pragmatic reasoning to learn the meaning of unfamiliar words. One important challenge for pragmatic reasoning is that it requires integrating multiple information sources. Here we study this integration process. We isolate two sources of pragmatic information and, using a probabilistic model of conversational reasoning, formalize both how they s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a recent study with adults and children, we manipulated expectations about informativeness and common ground in a different way. 48 we also found a close alignment between model predictions and the data. The flexibility of this modeling framework stems from its conceptualization of human communication as a form of rational social action.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in a recent study with adults and children, we manipulated expectations about informativeness and common ground in a different way. 48 we also found a close alignment between model predictions and the data. The flexibility of this modeling framework stems from its conceptualization of human communication as a form of rational social action.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It assumes that, while children's sensitivity to the individual information sources increases with age, the way integration proceeds remains constant. 7,48 In the model, this is accomplished by creating age-dependent parameters capturing developmental changes in sensitivity to speaker informativeness (α i , Fig. 1d), the common ground (ρ i , Fig.…”
Section: From Early In Development Children Use Several Different Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, non-verbal aspects of the utterance (such as eye-gaze or gestures) can affect children's mutual exclusivity inferences [68][69][70][71][72] . As a first step in this direction, we recently studied how adults and children integrate non-verbal utterances with common ground 51 . Using a structurally similar rational-integration model, we also found a close alignment between model predictions and the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the model presents an explicit and substantive theory of development. It assumes that, while children's sensitivity to the individual information sources increases with age, the way integration proceeds remains constant 7,51 . In the model, this is accomplished by creating age-dependent parameters capturing developmental changes in sensitivity to speaker informativeness (α i , Fig.…”
Section: How Young Children Integrate Information Sources To Infer the Meaning Of Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it has been used to predict how adults and children integrate different information sources to make inferences about what a speaker is referring to [54]. In one study, Bohn and colleagues [55] measured children's developing sensitivity to different information sources, for example, their linguistic knowledge or their sensitivity to common ground.…”
Section: Computational Models Of Linguistic Communication In Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%