2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-015-0383-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting juvenile Chinook Salmon routing in riverine and tidal channels of a freshwater estuary

Abstract: As juvenile salmonids migrate from natal streams to the ocean they can encounter junctions leading to migration routes that differ in quality and survival probability, including: side channels, agricultural diversions, floodplains, cooling intakes and turbines. Although juvenile salmon are known to use all these routes, it is often difficult to estimate what proportion of migrants may use each. Managers would benefit from knowledge of how hydrologic manipulation (e.g., dam releases, water diversions) can reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Perry et al (2015) showed both that the probability of a fish remaining in the Sacramento River ranged from near zero during reverse-flow flood tides to near one during ebb tides, and that the probability of a fish remaining in the Sacramento River was higher than the proportion of discharge remaining in the Sacramento River. This finding was supported by Cavallo et al (2015) who compiled empirical routing estimates from multiple telemetry studies. They found that the proportion of fish that entered distributaries (secondary channels that branch off a main channel) was consistently lower than the fraction of discharge that entered the distributaries.…”
Section: Migration Routingmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For example, Perry et al (2015) showed both that the probability of a fish remaining in the Sacramento River ranged from near zero during reverse-flow flood tides to near one during ebb tides, and that the probability of a fish remaining in the Sacramento River was higher than the proportion of discharge remaining in the Sacramento River. This finding was supported by Cavallo et al (2015) who compiled empirical routing estimates from multiple telemetry studies. They found that the proportion of fish that entered distributaries (secondary channels that branch off a main channel) was consistently lower than the fraction of discharge that entered the distributaries.…”
Section: Migration Routingmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Results of acoustic tagging studies in the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers have generated important insights into overall low survival, effects of flows and turbidity on survival, diversity in migration behaviors among races of Chinook Salmon, and variability in survival rates among different regions of the river, Delta, and bays (Buchanan et al 2013;Singer et al 2013;Cavallo et al 2015;Michel et al 2015;reviewed in Perry et al 2016). However, most of these studies were conducted on hatcheryorigin salmon from different runs, highlighting the need to expand this approach to gathering comparable information on salmon originating and migrating from Central Valley rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of spatially explicit mechanistic fish movement models in response to environmental conditions was identified as an important step in improving water resource management in the Sacramento−San Joaquin Delta (Rose et al 2011;Delta ISB 2015). Yet statistical models that summarize the relationship between migration routing and hydrodynamics have been instrumental in understanding how individual fish behavior gives rise to emergent patterns that water management actions ultimately influence (Cavallo et al 2015;Perry et al 2015Perry et al , 2018. We view our model as a bridge between a purely mechanistic or purely statistical model because it provides a quantitative description of a conceptual model that is rooted in physical and biological principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%