2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting intention to work with social robots at anticipation stage: Assessing the role of behavioral desire and anticipated emotions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
4
57
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study aimed to test whether the social responses add predictive power to the TAM specifically for the persuasive robot. Using the same method as in [97], we compared the R 2 for Attitude and Intention from TAM (presented in Objective 1) and PRAM (inclusion of social responses presented in Objective 2) by calculating the F-ratio and its significance. Results of these analyses confirmed that adding social responses as determinants to TAM significantly increased the predictive power in explaining the acceptance of the persuasive robot (demonstrated by PRAM).…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study aimed to test whether the social responses add predictive power to the TAM specifically for the persuasive robot. Using the same method as in [97], we compared the R 2 for Attitude and Intention from TAM (presented in Objective 1) and PRAM (inclusion of social responses presented in Objective 2) by calculating the F-ratio and its significance. Results of these analyses confirmed that adding social responses as determinants to TAM significantly increased the predictive power in explaining the acceptance of the persuasive robot (demonstrated by PRAM).…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the model fits the data 100%, or in other words, the model explains all of the variations in the endogenous variable, then the R 2 for such variable is equal to 1.00. The R 2 value was used in the earlier study [99] especially in human-robot interaction applications [97,100] as a model-fit measure [101]. According to Cohen [96], R 2 of 0.02, 0.13 and 0.26 are considered as small, medium and large effects respectively in the field of social and behavioural science.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social robots are becoming attractive to many of us. There are attempts to involve robots in more intense interactions with humans, more collaboration on certain specific goals (Picarra and Giger, 2018), tasks such as preparing medication or serving food, teaching children foreign languages, and assisting the elderly with their daily activities (Simon, 2015;McDaniel, 2010;Wada et al, 2005). Robots are also used as walking assistants for children with multiple disabilities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…此外, 人与机器人交互之中的一些具 体行为也会对接受度产生影响. 例如, 研究发现参与机 器人的制作 [96] 或者组装过程 [97] [99] , 它能够预测使用者特定的情绪反应(如钦 佩、嫉妒、轻蔑和怜悯等), 并进而预测特定的行为倾 向(帮助或伤害) [100] . 对机器人社会存在的感知也是影 响机器人接受度的一个重要因素.…”
Section: 拟人化是在机器人外观研究中最为热点的一个问题unclassified