2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1466-8564(99)00005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting inactivation of Salmonella senftenberg by pulsed electric fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
99
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The same conclusions were reached by Raso et al, (2000) and , who observed that at any electric field strength investigated the inactivation was very fast in the first moments of the treatment and then the number of survivors decreased slowly. The reduction in the viability was caused mostly by the first pulses, and increasing the number of pulses did not have the same effect as the first ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The same conclusions were reached by Raso et al, (2000) and , who observed that at any electric field strength investigated the inactivation was very fast in the first moments of the treatment and then the number of survivors decreased slowly. The reduction in the viability was caused mostly by the first pulses, and increasing the number of pulses did not have the same effect as the first ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In the majority of these technologies a moderate temperature rise is produced, however, it does not reach the level of a thermal treatment (Raso and Barbosa, 2003).…”
Section: Nonthermal Preservation Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several process parameters affect the ability of PEF to reduce microbial population in food such as strength of electric field, pulse length and shape, number of pulses and temperature [15]. On a general node, increased intensity of these factors improves microbial inactivation but their exact relationship with the survival rate of microorganisms is not clear.…”
Section: Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%