2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcpmt.2016.2523809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Heat Transfer for Low- and High-Frequency Central-Orifice Synthetic Jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, a continuous jet CFD model [1] will likely deviate from the ultrasonic micro-blower response. In the far field, the response will be more comparable, as partly revealed in the heat transfer correlation of Ikhlaq et al [9]. Here, the micro-blower performance was not affected by jet frequency for H/D > 10.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, a continuous jet CFD model [1] will likely deviate from the ultrasonic micro-blower response. In the far field, the response will be more comparable, as partly revealed in the heat transfer correlation of Ikhlaq et al [9]. Here, the micro-blower performance was not affected by jet frequency for H/D > 10.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 52%
“…14 shows the variation of average Nusselt number versus frequency at H/D = 10. The heat transfer peaks at f = 25 kHz, which further suggests that the jet has its maximum flow rate here [9]. Off of this peak frequency, the heat transfer decreases by less than 10% between 24.5 kHz and 25.5 kHz.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations