2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-7836(02)00076-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting freshwater fish distributions using landscape-level variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, these are satisfactory descriptors in evaluating the levels of environmental aquatic degradation . Thus it is presumed that undisturbed water courses present greater richness, species diversity and a relatively balanced distribution of individuals (Navas-Pereira & Henrique, 1996;Gafny et al, 2000;Argent et al, 2003;Cunico et al, 2006;Otero et al, 2006). In this study, this partially occurs in terms of fish richness as certain stream stretches located in preserved areas present a higher richness average (P1, 23 species; P4, 20) than stretches located in impacted areas (NP6, 17; NP5, 15; NP1, 11; NP2, 11; NP3, 9 species, respectively), with the exception of the NP4 stream (26 species), where the diversity index displayed the highest value among the stream stretches sampled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, these are satisfactory descriptors in evaluating the levels of environmental aquatic degradation . Thus it is presumed that undisturbed water courses present greater richness, species diversity and a relatively balanced distribution of individuals (Navas-Pereira & Henrique, 1996;Gafny et al, 2000;Argent et al, 2003;Cunico et al, 2006;Otero et al, 2006). In this study, this partially occurs in terms of fish richness as certain stream stretches located in preserved areas present a higher richness average (P1, 23 species; P4, 20) than stretches located in impacted areas (NP6, 17; NP5, 15; NP1, 11; NP2, 11; NP3, 9 species, respectively), with the exception of the NP4 stream (26 species), where the diversity index displayed the highest value among the stream stretches sampled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stream size (represented here by watershed area) strongly influences stream fish assemblages [56][57][58][59][60], and watershed area was important in all our models. Ecoregion, latitude, and longitude all are related and indicate a strong location effect on the fish species.…”
Section: Importance Of Watershed Attributesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Habitat disturbance has an important role in constraining the types of ecological processes and patterns observed in streams (Ward & Stanford, 1983;Power et al, 1988;Resh et al, 1988;Poff & Ward, 1990). Understanding the habitat requirements of each species and the relationship with environmental variables is critical to comprehending their ecology in natural systems and to evaluate possible change scenarios (Argent, Bishop, Stauffer, Carline, & Myers, 2003;Jowett, Richardson, & Bonnett, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%