2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2009.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting feature interactions by using inconsistency models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calder et al (2003) showed how programming languages, such as Promela (Calder and Miller, 2001), CSP (Hoare, 1978) and LOTOS (Gorse et al, 2006), may be used to specify features. Methods explored so far in FI detection include simulation (Thomas, 1997), model checking (Plath and Ryan, 2000;Calder and Miller, 2001), theorem proving (Gammelgard and Kristensen, 1994) and prediction (Crespo, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calder et al (2003) showed how programming languages, such as Promela (Calder and Miller, 2001), CSP (Hoare, 1978) and LOTOS (Gorse et al, 2006), may be used to specify features. Methods explored so far in FI detection include simulation (Thomas, 1997), model checking (Plath and Ryan, 2000;Calder and Miller, 2001), theorem proving (Gammelgard and Kristensen, 1994) and prediction (Crespo, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the feature interaction method was presented in both 3D and feature interaction graph format in a developed software system [9] . G. C. Rui [10] generated hypothetical features for feature interaction detection, which is supported by sets of all possible events, predicates and inconsistent behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%