2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90081-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting elementary school participation in children with disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
38
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Our schedule in this sector is to try to help children attending ordinary school with four years in preschool instead of two and two or three years in each form of primary school. The most advanceed of them was in primary 2.Education is important since these children could progress if they are well trained according to their specific capacities (Mancini et al, 2000;Kozulin et al, 2010;Giaouria et al, 2010). Supportive care was offered to some of our children.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our schedule in this sector is to try to help children attending ordinary school with four years in preschool instead of two and two or three years in each form of primary school. The most advanceed of them was in primary 2.Education is important since these children could progress if they are well trained according to their specific capacities (Mancini et al, 2000;Kozulin et al, 2010;Giaouria et al, 2010). Supportive care was offered to some of our children.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CART is a nonparametric, multivariate statistical method that develops a decision tree that is a graphic representation of the association between independent variables and a dichotomous dependent variable, thus defining favorable and unfavorable outcomes 16,17 .…”
Section: B Predictive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divisions are performed successively until there is a minimum number of cases in each division ( five for the present study), thus resulting in a terminal node 16,17 . Only the predictive variables that were more informative of favorable and unfavorable outcomes were chosen in each model.…”
Section: B Predictive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information should concern the individual child. 6,[12][13][14][15][16][17] Predictions about outcome in habilitation are usually expressed as functional performance, 18,19 for example, the motor functions in CP are classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). 20 A child classified at GMFCS level V will need more additional care than a child at GMFCS level V. However, in several studies that have focussed on the consequences of non-progressive, permanent developmental disorders, it was concluded that there is an urgent need to define these consequences in terms of need of additional care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11]16,21,22 Defining the severity of disorders in this way is generic, and provides insight into the efforts parents, other caregivers, and the community must make, not only to provide the child with the necessary care, but also to prevent secondary health conditions and to contribute to resource policies and quality assurance. 19,23,24 Aim The aim of the present study was to identify, by a systematic literature search, instruments that classify, in children with permanent, non-progressive developmental disorders, the type and quantity of the additional care requirements and to predict the need for this care in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%