2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7sc01247k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting electronic structure properties of transition metal complexes with neural networks

Abstract: Our neural network predicts spin-state ordering of transition metal complexes to near-chemical accuracy with respect to DFT reference.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

19
472
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(495 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(186 reference statements)
19
472
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While still recent overall, the evidence for the applicability of ML models to atomistic simulation and electronic property predictions has become overwhelming by now.A n incomplete list of studies which infer QM observables,rather than solving the conventional quantum chemistry approximations to Schrçdingerse quation (SE), [29] includes ML models of enthalpies of formation, [30,31] density functionals, [32] basis-set effects, [33] reorganization energies, [34] chemical reactivity, [35] atomization energies, [11] kinetic density functionals, [36] electronic ground-state properties, [20,37] transition state dividing surfaces, [38] polymer properties, [39] electron transmission coefficients, [40] crystal properties, [41][42][43][44] Anderson impurity models, [45,46] NMR nuclear shifts, [47] frontier orbital eigenvalues, [13] atomic charges,d ipole and quadrupole-moments, [48] electronic excitation energies, [49] Møller-Plesset theory corrections, [50] interatomic many-body expansions, [51] transition metals, [52] bonds in molecules, [53] and electron density functionals for use in ab initio molecular dynamics. [54] But also fitting the potential energy surface is awell-known problem in quantum chemistry,and has triggered substantial research on how to interpolate best with the least number of single point calculations.W agner, Schatz and Bowman introduced the modern computing perspective in the 80s, [55,56] while neural network fits to PES started to appear with Sumpter and Noid in 1992, [57] followed by Lorenz, Gross and Scheffler in 2004, [58] Manzhos and Carrington in 2006, [59] Behler and Parrinello in 2007,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While still recent overall, the evidence for the applicability of ML models to atomistic simulation and electronic property predictions has become overwhelming by now.A n incomplete list of studies which infer QM observables,rather than solving the conventional quantum chemistry approximations to Schrçdingerse quation (SE), [29] includes ML models of enthalpies of formation, [30,31] density functionals, [32] basis-set effects, [33] reorganization energies, [34] chemical reactivity, [35] atomization energies, [11] kinetic density functionals, [36] electronic ground-state properties, [20,37] transition state dividing surfaces, [38] polymer properties, [39] electron transmission coefficients, [40] crystal properties, [41][42][43][44] Anderson impurity models, [45,46] NMR nuclear shifts, [47] frontier orbital eigenvalues, [13] atomic charges,d ipole and quadrupole-moments, [48] electronic excitation energies, [49] Møller-Plesset theory corrections, [50] interatomic many-body expansions, [51] transition metals, [52] bonds in molecules, [53] and electron density functionals for use in ab initio molecular dynamics. [54] But also fitting the potential energy surface is awell-known problem in quantum chemistry,and has triggered substantial research on how to interpolate best with the least number of single point calculations.W agner, Schatz and Bowman introduced the modern computing perspective in the 80s, [55,56] while neural network fits to PES started to appear with Sumpter and Noid in 1992, [57] followed by Lorenz, Gross and Scheffler in 2004, [58] Manzhos and Carrington in 2006, [59] Behler and Parrinello in 2007,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other is the nonresonant effects (CHEM), due to the interaction between the molecule and the surface as consequence of the chemical bond (CB) established. Recent studies report the SERS effect for interaction between metallic oxides and Rhodamine 6G (R6G), as well as the study of the effects caused by the modification of CB in transition metals complexes . In this matter, copper oxide (CuO) has been used in the study of SERS in molecules such as 4‐mercaptopyridine (4‐MPy) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies report the SERS effect for interaction between metallic oxides and Rhodamine 6G (R6G), [21] as well as the study of the effects caused by the modification of CB in transition metals complexes. [22,23] In this matter, copper oxide (CuO) has been used in the study of SERS in molecules such as 4-mercaptopyridine (4-MPy). [24,25] In these reports, the overall enhancement was studied from the mechanism CT. Additionally, the molecule-surface interaction is reported as responsible of new electronic states as a result of the chemical absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For complicated aggregate structures, evolutionary algorithms and, possibly, neural networks might be applied for further refining the aggregate candidate set. Periodic boundary conditions might be used at any growth step to check whether experimental properties of extended supramolecular systems are sufficiently well reproduced at that growth step .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%