BackgroundRadial artery (RA) was the second arterial graft introduced in clinical practice
for myocardial revascularization. The skeletonization technique of the left
internal thoracic artery (LITA) may actually change the graft's flow capacity with
potential advantages. This leads to the assumption that the behavior of the RA, as
a coronary graft, is similar to that of the LITA, when skeletonized.ObjectiveThis study evaluated 'free' aortic-coronary radial artery (RA) grafts, whether
skeletonized or with adjacent tissues.MethodsA prospective randomized study comparing 40 patients distributed into two groups
was conducted. In group I, we used skeletonized radial arteries (20 patients), and
in group II, we used radial arteries with adjacent tissues (20 patients). After
the surgical procedure, patients underwent flow velocity measurements.ResultsThe main surgical variables were: RA internal diameter, RA length, and free blood
flow in the radial artery. The mean RA graft diameters as calculated using
quantitative angiography in the immediate postoperative period were similar, as
well as the flow velocity measurement variables. On the other hand, coronary
cineangiography showed the presence of occlusion in one RA graft and stenosis in
five RA grafts in GII, while GI presented stenosis in only one RA graft (p =
0.045).ConclusionThese results show that the morphological and pathological features, as well as
the hemodynamic performance of the free radial artery grafts, whether prepared in
a skeletonized manner or with adjacent tissues, are similar. However, a larger
number of non-obstructive lesions may be observed when RA is prepared with
adjacent tissues.