2013
DOI: 10.2147/dmso.s34220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting cardiometabolic risk: waist-to-height ratio or BMI. A meta-analysis

Abstract: Background and objectivesThe identification of increased cardiometabolic risk among asymptomatic individuals remains a huge challenge. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the association of body mass index (BMI), which is an index of general obesity, and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), an index of abdominal obesity, with cardiometabolic risk in cross-sectional and prospective studies.MethodsPubMed and Embase databases were searched for cross-sectional or prospective studies that evaluated the associatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
169
2
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
10
169
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The overweight category width is larger in the Chinese study, and the fact that the overweight threshold is lower than the estimated presently (see Figure 8) is explainable by racial differences. [24] Yet, the narrower overweight range, than might be anticipated, may be due to the presumed fixed value for the obesity threshold, whereas the current result suggests it may vary with age. One problem shared by the Australian, Chinese and as well as the American study is though that the "overweight" segment includes also all obese, and the "obese" segment all stages thereof.…”
Section: Overweight and Obese Wchrcontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The overweight category width is larger in the Chinese study, and the fact that the overweight threshold is lower than the estimated presently (see Figure 8) is explainable by racial differences. [24] Yet, the narrower overweight range, than might be anticipated, may be due to the presumed fixed value for the obesity threshold, whereas the current result suggests it may vary with age. One problem shared by the Australian, Chinese and as well as the American study is though that the "overweight" segment includes also all obese, and the "obese" segment all stages thereof.…”
Section: Overweight and Obese Wchrcontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…One of the suggested advantages in choosing WHt ratio instead of BMI is the ability to use one single cut-off point (0.5), irrespectively of age, sex, or ethnicity [28], resulting in an immediate and simple message, namely to "keep the waist circumference to less than half the height". A recent meta-analysis of epidemiological studies found that the WHt ratio represents a superior diagnostic tool in detecting subjects with high cardiometabolic risk, including diabetes; however, this has proved more useful in Asian populations [29]. The latter may explain why the two measurements (BMI and WHt) were found to be equal in predicting diabetes risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El ICT no es reportado en el INTERHEART, donde muestra una asociación global en varones menor que la propia cintura abdominal (OR: 1,18 vs. 1,19) (11). Sin embargo, el ICT es un buen indicador ROC en estudios predictivos o de riesgo cardiovascular en poblaciones españolas y mundiales (12,13,27,29,30). En nuestro estudio también presenta un alto grado de asociación, aunque la medida específica de CU y su quintil superior justifican con diferencias significativas el mayor rigor y poder del índice a nivel umbilical (ICUT).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Las estrategias en prevención cardiovascular deben fijar los objetivos de control antropométrico con aquellos indicadores que se muestren más fieles y útiles en traducir el riesgo cardiometabólico real. El índice de masa corporal (IMC) y su capacidad para expresar dicho riesgo o predecir eventos cardiovasculares es debatido, y se recomiendan otros indicadores como la circunferencia de cintura (CC) (6-10), el índice cintura-cadera (ICCad) (10,11) o el índice cintura-talla (ICT) (12,13). Sin embargo, cada indicador y cada medición antropométrica mantienen relaciones dispares con la distribución volumétrica del riesgo cardiometabólico y con la discriminación de los verdaderos componentes corporales de riesgo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified