2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting carbon emissions, emissions reductions, and carbon removal due to deforestation and plantation forests in Southeast Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, given the marbled cat's avoidance of degraded forests (including edges and fragmented forests) and inability to adapt to oil palm landscapes, a population decline of more than 30% over the last 10‐year period can be reasonably suspected. These threats have not ceased (Estoque et al, 2019; Grantham et al, 2020; Sasaki et al, 2021; Wilcove et al, 2013) so the marbled cat likely meets the requirements to be classified as Vulnerable under criterion A2 subsection C of the IUCN RL categories criteria (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2019). Conserving and increasing the connectivity of large intact forests is a priority for marbled cat conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, given the marbled cat's avoidance of degraded forests (including edges and fragmented forests) and inability to adapt to oil palm landscapes, a population decline of more than 30% over the last 10‐year period can be reasonably suspected. These threats have not ceased (Estoque et al, 2019; Grantham et al, 2020; Sasaki et al, 2021; Wilcove et al, 2013) so the marbled cat likely meets the requirements to be classified as Vulnerable under criterion A2 subsection C of the IUCN RL categories criteria (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2019). Conserving and increasing the connectivity of large intact forests is a priority for marbled cat conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion of cropland to forest increased carbon storage by 0.42 Tg; the conversion of wetland and water to forest was minimal, resulting in very limited reduction and increase in carbon storage, respectively; built-up land area was in continuous high expansion, and grassland was mainly converted to built-up land and cropland, so they did not produce a conversion to forest, resulting in no gain or loss of carbon storage (Table 5). Unlike tropical regions such as South America, Southeast Asia, and central Africa, where the reduction in carbon storage is due to the shrinking of forest areas [75][76][77][78][79], the change in carbon storage due to the change in forest on Hainan Island is positive, and even though some of the increase in carbon storage is offset by the reduction in carbon storage due to the transfer out of cropland, a small increase in carbon storage can still be maintained. From 1992 to 2019, the decrease in LULC carbon storage on Hainan Island caused by the continuous increase in built-up land area was 3.24 Tg, the absolute amount of change being greater than the absolute amount of change in carbon storage caused by the decrease in cropland or the increase in forest, and is the most critical aspect of carbon storage change on Hainan Island (Table 6).…”
Section: Response Of Carbon Storage To Lulc Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shrinking of forest in northern Brazil is widely known, so an ecological conservation development pattern will help increase carbon storage in this region [77]. Although contradictory to improving local living standards, the implementation of appropriate ecological protection policies in central Africa and Southeast Asia [79] can promote carbon storage. Even in temperate regions, such as China's Loess Plateau [55] and northwest desert regions [54], ecological conservation policies that promote the growth of forest and grassland areas can maximize carbon storage.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Carbon Storage Evolution In the Context Of Hum...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dynamic of ecosystem services in the deep soil may be different from those in the surface layer. In addition, spatial analysis can be carried out from the perspective of landscape to evaluate the spatio-temporal changes in different forest types and the evolution of ecosystem services [52,53], thus providing support for forest management.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%