2020
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting biomarkers from classifier for liver metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinomas using machine learning models

Abstract: Background Early diagnosis of liver metastasis is of great importance for enhancing the survival of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CAD) patients, and the combined use of a single biomarker in a classier model has shown great improvement in predicting the metastasis of several types of cancers. However, it is little reported for CAD. This study therefore aimed to screen an optimal classier model of CAD with liver metastasis and explore the metastatic mechanisms of genes when applying this classier model. Methods Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of outcomes with imbalanced classes (OS24 and ORR), we computed the class weight that was further included in the model. The main reasons for selecting the CB model among other similar techniques are examples of CB’s successful application in oncological studies ( 20 22 ) where it outperformed the other gradient models. The efficacy of models was evaluated and compared using the following performance metrics: confusion matrix, accuracy (ACC), Precision, Recall, F1-score and Area Under the Curve (AUC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of outcomes with imbalanced classes (OS24 and ORR), we computed the class weight that was further included in the model. The main reasons for selecting the CB model among other similar techniques are examples of CB’s successful application in oncological studies ( 20 22 ) where it outperformed the other gradient models. The efficacy of models was evaluated and compared using the following performance metrics: confusion matrix, accuracy (ACC), Precision, Recall, F1-score and Area Under the Curve (AUC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CatBoost is an excellent choice for clinical data since categorical features are prevalent in these datasets [ 57 ]. Shuwen et al [ 58 ] used six algorithms, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, SVM, GBDT, ANNs, and CatBoost, to detect liver metastasis in the early stages of colorectal cancer (CRC). Their analysis demonstrated the optimal performance of the CatBoost model for the early diagnosis of patients with liver metastasis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of model construction were as described previously ( 36 ). First, before model construction, the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm based on the sklearn.feature_selection method was applied to feature selection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%