2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3049446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting at-Risk Students at Different Percentages of Course Length for Early Intervention Using Machine Learning Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this step, we analysed the articles based on the quality of the dataset, in terms of the features used, the sample size, population, and collection methods. As can be seen in Figure 4, majority of researchers have used available data sources and records found in public dataset or through university/school repositories, precisely a total of seventy-three (73) studies indicate this ([10], [13], [56], [58]- [66], [20], [69], [71]- [78], [81], [27], [82], [83], [85], [87]- [93], [45], [94]- [97], [100]- [104], [106], [49], [107]- [110], [113]- [117], [119], [50], [121], [123]- [126], [128], [129], [131], [132], [134], [51], [135], [136], [138], [54], [55]). While these sources are easily accessible and provide expected accuracy of the prediction models, some researchers opted for a mixed-mode of data collection where both available sources and que...…”
Section: B Dataset Sample Population Size and Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this step, we analysed the articles based on the quality of the dataset, in terms of the features used, the sample size, population, and collection methods. As can be seen in Figure 4, majority of researchers have used available data sources and records found in public dataset or through university/school repositories, precisely a total of seventy-three (73) studies indicate this ([10], [13], [56], [58]- [66], [20], [69], [71]- [78], [81], [27], [82], [83], [85], [87]- [93], [45], [94]- [97], [100]- [104], [106], [49], [107]- [110], [113]- [117], [119], [50], [121], [123]- [126], [128], [129], [131], [132], [134], [51], [135], [136], [138], [54], [55]). While these sources are easily accessible and provide expected accuracy of the prediction models, some researchers opted for a mixed-mode of data collection where both available sources and que...…”
Section: B Dataset Sample Population Size and Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study used classification techniques such as decision trees, random forest, and Naive Bayes to compare their accuracy rates. Similarly, Adnan et al [28] proposed a predictive model that analyzes the problems faced by at-risk students. They trained and tested their model using various machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms to characterize the learning behavior.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the authors considered the sequential information by calculating the daily learning activities, the averaged/median and normalized alternatives of students' actual learning behaviors largely undermine the associations between the behaviors performed across different timestamps. Adnan et al (2021) calculated the sum and average of the clickstreams at the stages of 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% according to the progress of the course, and built models to predict students' learning performance during each stage. Similarly, in this study, the authors did not consider the temporal associations among the learning behaviors during each stage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the validity of the proposed method, we used the OULAD (see https://analyse.kmi.open.ac.uk/open_dataset) dataset collected by Open University (Kuzilek et al., 2017). Multiple studies (Adnan et al., 2021; Aljohani et al., 2019; Hlosta et al., 2018, 2017; Qiao & Hu, 2020) have been conducted using this dataset as a baseline to verify the effectiveness of their methods in predicting student learning performance. In this study, we selected four courses purposely from the dataset, where two of them (i.e., AAA_2013J and AAA_2014J) were in the social science field and the other two (i.e., CCC_2014B and CCC_2014J) were in the STEM field.…”
Section: Dataset Description and Feature Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%