2016
DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.02.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting anatomical results of surgical treatment of idiopathic macular hole

Abstract: Preoperative central subfield retinal thickness is a strong and probably the best predictor of anatomical results of IMH surgical treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The macular hole index that can reflect the prognosis of the surgery and its visual outcome has been gaining popularity among the publications on the macular hole and it’s now been used as a useful predictor for the physiological outcome of MH. 22 , 23 The determination of the macular hole index as was obtained in this study are of easy application, therefore, the better outcome of the surgical procedure can be pre-operatively determined. The functional results found in this study are comparable to those of literature, 24 , 25 showing that MHI is a good predictive factor for FTMH surgery outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The macular hole index that can reflect the prognosis of the surgery and its visual outcome has been gaining popularity among the publications on the macular hole and it’s now been used as a useful predictor for the physiological outcome of MH. 22 , 23 The determination of the macular hole index as was obtained in this study are of easy application, therefore, the better outcome of the surgical procedure can be pre-operatively determined. The functional results found in this study are comparable to those of literature, 24 , 25 showing that MHI is a good predictive factor for FTMH surgery outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Among preoperative factors, two well established are symptom duration and preoperative VA. The other factors are patient age and OCT parameters such as stage of FTMH, minimum diameter or/and base diameter of the FTMH, central subfield retinal thickness, height of the FTMH and diameter of internal/external segments layer IS/OS, and external limiting membrane (ELM) defects [5, 21, 22]. However, these parameters are anatomical, imaging-based features, and to estimate the result of FTMH surgery, functional tests are required too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M and N were the curve lengths of the detached photoreceptor arms, and BASE was the length of the retinal pigment epithelial layer (RPE layer) detaching from the photoreceptors. Some studies used central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT) to predict anatomical results of MH surgery, but the results were contradictory [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%