2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32695-0_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Academic Emotions Based on Brainwaves, Mouse Behaviour and Personality Profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [35], researchers attempted to recognize an intimate human quality such as "affect" using a combination of facial images with prosodic and spectral features from the voice. In [3], they also tried to recognize emotions using other behavior measurements such as brainwaves or mouse movements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…In [35], researchers attempted to recognize an intimate human quality such as "affect" using a combination of facial images with prosodic and spectral features from the voice. In [3], they also tried to recognize emotions using other behavior measurements such as brainwaves or mouse movements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…As for the Motor Imagery, the performance (61.3% for the classification accuracy with a standard deviation of 4.3%) greatly suffered from the low classification accuracy that led to many errors and much slower interactions. Azcarraga & Suarez (2001) suggested that the Emotiv EPOC needs a small amount of time to normalize a user’s data. In their study they told the subjects to relax for a period of three minutes in order for the EEG to allow to create a baseline for EEG data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also highlight the importance of incorporating psychological variables, such as personality and motivational factors, for affective computing [21]. Because affect is displayed contextually, it is critical to integrate people's personal information as much as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…The mouse pressure was as discriminable as skin conductance measure for the detection of frustration. Azcarraga and Suarez [21] evaluated EEG signals and mouse activities (the number of mouse clicks, distance traveled, click duration) during algebra learning in an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) to predict subjects' emotions (N = 25) during ITS learning. Prediction rates based solely on EEG were 54 to 88%.…”
Section: B Related Work:mouse Movement Analysis For Affectivementioning
confidence: 46%