2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02021.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted impact of climate change on European bats in relation to their biogeographic patterns

Abstract: There has been considerable recent interest concerning the impact of climate change on a wide range of taxa. However, little is known about how the biogeographic affinities of taxa may affect their responses to these impacts. Our main aim was to study how predicted climate change will affect the distribution of 28 European bat species grouped by their biogeographic patterns as determined by a spatial Principal Component Analysis. Using presence-only modelling techniques and climatic data (minimum temperature, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
170
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(78 reference statements)
2
170
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As with other taxa, climate change is predicted to alter the distribution of bat species (Scheel et al 1996;La Val 2004;Rebelo et al 2010;Hughes et al 2012). Altered distribution patterns are also anticipated for hibernating species due to changes in energetic demands (Humphries et al 2002).…”
Section: Seasonality and Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with other taxa, climate change is predicted to alter the distribution of bat species (Scheel et al 1996;La Val 2004;Rebelo et al 2010;Hughes et al 2012). Altered distribution patterns are also anticipated for hibernating species due to changes in energetic demands (Humphries et al 2002).…”
Section: Seasonality and Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15.6). Even species capable of shifting their ranges in response to the rapid rate of current climate change may be hampered by the limited availability of suitable caves and potential time required for suitable foraging habitats to develop (Rebelo et al 2010). …”
Section: Seasonality and Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has shown to be one of the best performing models in predicting species distributions with presence-only data (Elith et al, 2006;Hijmans and Graham, 2006), and it has been extensively applied to project species range and vegetation shifts under climate change (Rebelo et al, 2010;Ponce-Reyes et al, 2012;Wong et al, 2013). The full extent of the study area was used to extract background (pseudo-absence) data to improve model performance (VanderWal et al, 2009).…”
Section: Species Distribution Modeling and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to criticisms to the use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) in the species distribution modelling (Lobo et al, 2008;Li & Guo, 2013), we assessed model performance with both average AUC and the relative importance of commission and omission. AUC provides a single measure of model performance and ranges from 0.5 (randomness) to 1 (perfect discrimination), where a score higher than 0.7 is considered a good model performance (Fielding & Bell, 1997;Rebelo et al, 2010). As AUC is not appropriate to evaluate the accuracy of binary predictions, we also used true skill statistic (TSS) as suggested by recent studies (Lobo et al, 2008;Li & Guo, 2013) to assess the accuracy of the bamboo species models.…”
Section: Species Distribution Modelling and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%