2010
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.81.6.955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted and Observed Spectral Response from Collocated Shallow, Active- and Passive-Source Vs Data at Five ANSS Sites, Illinois and Indiana, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a comparative study of surface-wave methods to borehole results, Comina et al (2011) concluded that for sites where the maximum wavelength (either active-or passive-source) is greater than 60 m, inversion nonuniqueness does not significantly affect the accuracy and reliability of the V S30 estimate. Collocated refraction/reflection and ReMi surveys in southern Illinois found that the difference in V S30 results between methods was 2% or less at four of the five sites with distinct rock-sediment V S contrasts (Odum et al, 2010).…”
Section: S30 and Nehrp Classificationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a comparative study of surface-wave methods to borehole results, Comina et al (2011) concluded that for sites where the maximum wavelength (either active-or passive-source) is greater than 60 m, inversion nonuniqueness does not significantly affect the accuracy and reliability of the V S30 estimate. Collocated refraction/reflection and ReMi surveys in southern Illinois found that the difference in V S30 results between methods was 2% or less at four of the five sites with distinct rock-sediment V S contrasts (Odum et al, 2010).…”
Section: S30 and Nehrp Classificationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Active-source SH-wave (shear wave oriented in horizontal motion) seismic refraction/reflection profiling has been extensively used to obtain shallow V S data to depths of 50 m in a variety of geologic environments (Odum et al, , 2010Williams et al, 2003). In geologic environments where bedrock is shallow, this method is better at constraining the depth of high-impedance boundaries and bedrock V S .…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study of the 2008 M = 5.4 Mt. Carmel earthquake in Illinois showed site resonances in this range for USIN and EVIN, two seismic stations found within the study area (Odum et al 2010). On the other hand, at 1.0 s period, the higher amplifications are in the thickest soils within the ancient bedrock valley and extending to the north under the terrace alluvium deposits beneath Evansville.…”
Section: Table 2 Attenuation Relationships Used In the Scenario Grounmentioning
confidence: 69%