2018
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-18-0058.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictability of Recurrent Weather Regimes over North America during Winter from Submonthly Reforecasts

Abstract: Four recurrent weather regimes are identified over North America from October to March through a k-means clustering applied to MERRA daily 500-hPa geopotential heights over the 1982–2014 period. Three regimes resemble Rossby wave train patterns with some baroclinicity, while one is related to an NAO-like meridional pressure gradient between eastern North America and western regions of the North Atlantic. All regimes are associated with distinct rainfall and surface temperature anomalies over North America. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
81
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
18
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All days are then assigned to a regime based on their minimum Euclidean distance to the cluster centroids; we do not employ “no‐regime” days (Grams et al, ). The resultant regimes are very similar to those found in Vigaud et al (); they show that these regimes are a significant representation based on the classifiability index of Michelangeli et al (), so we do not repeat that calculation here. Our four regimes remain largely unchanged as a subset when five or six clusters are used, further indicating they are dominant patterns and form a concise characterization with reasonably large individual sample sizes.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All days are then assigned to a regime based on their minimum Euclidean distance to the cluster centroids; we do not employ “no‐regime” days (Grams et al, ). The resultant regimes are very similar to those found in Vigaud et al (); they show that these regimes are a significant representation based on the classifiability index of Michelangeli et al (), so we do not repeat that calculation here. Our four regimes remain largely unchanged as a subset when five or six clusters are used, further indicating they are dominant patterns and form a concise characterization with reasonably large individual sample sizes.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Although some prior work has described regimes across North America in a similar sense to the Atlantic regimes (Amini & Straus, 2019;Riddle et al, 2013;Robertson & Ghil, 1999;Straus et al, 2007;Vigaud et al, 2018), the use of regimes is not as common in this region. The number of regimes and the westward and eastward extent of the region used to define the regimes varies between studies, capturing different aspects of Pacific and Atlantic variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weather regimes can be viewed as "low-frequency envelopes" of synoptic weather variability (Cassou, 2008), with lifetimes ranging from several days to a few weeks. At the same time, regimes are accompanied by typical surface weather conditions and enhance the likelihood of large-scale weather extremes (e.g., Yiou and Nogaj, 2004;Della-Marta et al, 2007;Stefanon et al, 2012;Ferranti et al, 2018;Schaller et al, 2018;Vigaud et al, 2018). Weather regimes are commonly identified using clustering techniques applied to geopotential height.…”
Section: Weather Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model output statistics (MOS) has been shown to improve probabilistic weather forecasts (Hamill et al 2004), but fewer analyses have been yet done at subseasonal time scales. Submonthly forecasts based on extended logistic regression (ELR; Wilks 2009) have recently provided probabilistic precipitation forecast skill estimates on S2S time scales over different parts of the globe including North America (Vigaud et al 2017a(Vigaud et al ,b, 2018, but such approaches have yet to be applied to surface temperatures. In the ELR methodology proposed in Vigaud et al (2017a), calibration is done at the gridpoint level (i.e., a separate regression model is constructed for every location without using information from neighboring grid points).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submonthly forecasts based on extended logistic regression (ELR; Wilks 2009) have recently provided probabilistic precipitation forecast skill estimates on S2S time scales over different parts of the globe including North America (Vigaud et al 2017a(Vigaud et al ,b, 2018, but such approaches have yet to be applied to surface temperatures. In the ELR methodology proposed in Vigaud et al (2017a), calibration is done at the gridpoint level (i.e., a separate regression model is constructed for every location without using information from neighboring grid points). Since gridpoint regressions are prone to sampling uncertainties that can translate into spatially noisy forecasts, there might be potential for improvements by including spatial information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%