2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predatory and trophobiont-tending ants respond differently to fig and fig wasp volatiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the presence during the emergence phase of numerous fig wasps on fig surfaces often attracts various arthropod predators such as mantids, spiders, and predatory beetles (Bronstein 1988;Zachariades 1994;Zachariades et al 2009 (Bronstein 1988;Compton and Robertson 1988;Schatz et al 2008). Ants are particularly efficient in the capture of fig wasps, detecting the odor they emit, and exhibiting olfactory learning (Schatz et al 2003, Ranganathan andBorges 2009;Schatz and Hossaert-McKey 2010). Moreover, as fig odors change with time (Proffit et al 2008), some ants are also able to learn the specific odor associated with developmental phases when the probability of the presence of fig wasps is higher, and to modulate their presence and their aggressiveness using these olfactory cues (Schatz and Hossaert-McKey 2010).…”
Section: Nursery Pollination Mutualisms As Network Of Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the presence during the emergence phase of numerous fig wasps on fig surfaces often attracts various arthropod predators such as mantids, spiders, and predatory beetles (Bronstein 1988;Zachariades 1994;Zachariades et al 2009 (Bronstein 1988;Compton and Robertson 1988;Schatz et al 2008). Ants are particularly efficient in the capture of fig wasps, detecting the odor they emit, and exhibiting olfactory learning (Schatz et al 2003, Ranganathan andBorges 2009;Schatz and Hossaert-McKey 2010). Moreover, as fig odors change with time (Proffit et al 2008), some ants are also able to learn the specific odor associated with developmental phases when the probability of the presence of fig wasps is higher, and to modulate their presence and their aggressiveness using these olfactory cues (Schatz and Hossaert-McKey 2010).…”
Section: Nursery Pollination Mutualisms As Network Of Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In F. carica, F. fistulosa and F. racemosa ants learned to use the volatile organic compounds emitted by figs during the receptive and wasp emergence periods, which led to high predation rates on pollinating wasps (Fig. 2h, Schatz et al, , 2006Ranganathan and Borges, 2009;Schatz and Hossaert-McKey, 2010;HossaertMcKey et al, 2010), and the volatile chemicals emitted by the pollinators and NPFWs themselves are detected by at least two species of ants on F. fistulosa . Primary seed dispersal by birds, bats, small mammals and primates (Kalko et al, 1996;Hodgkison et al, 2007;Borges et al, 2008;Soler, 2010) and secondary dispersal by ants (Kaufmann et al, 1991) is likely to be mediated by olfactory compounds originating from the mature figs and the elaiosome of seeds, respectively.…”
Section: Chemical Mediation Of Antefig Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary seed dispersal by birds, bats, small mammals and primates (Kalko et al, 1996;Hodgkison et al, 2007;Borges et al, 2008;Soler, 2010) and secondary dispersal by ants (Kaufmann et al, 1991) is likely to be mediated by olfactory compounds originating from the mature figs and the elaiosome of seeds, respectively. Investigations in chemical ecology promise to reveal how insect species interact in the complex communities supported by figs Ranganathan and Borges, 2009;Schatz and Hossaert-McKey, 2010;Hossaert-McKey et al, 2010). Fig pollinators tend to enter receptive syconia quickly and their offspring emerge from mature syconia rapidly, limiting the opportunity for ants to prey on them.…”
Section: Chemical Mediation Of Antefig Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ants associated with plants as herbivores, seed predators or seed dispersers use plant secondary compounds (Cherrett and Seaforth, 1970;Saverschek et al, 2010), plant nutrients (Marshall et al, 1979;Skidmore and Heithaus, 1988) or other chemical features of their mutualistic partners (Ghazoul, 2001;Pierce et al, 2002;Stadler and Dixon, 2005;Choe and Rust, 2006;Youngsteadt et al, 2008;Willmer et al, 2009;Hojo et al, 2014) as recognition, feedant or anti-feedant cues. Predatory ants that feed on plant-associated insect prey may use volatile, plant-derived compounds to obtain information about the location and type of insect prey available on plant resources (Ranganathan and Borges, 2009;Schatz and Hossaert-McKey, 2010). However, such predatory ants feeding on insects associated with plants may also use less volatile chemicals such as insect cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) as feedant cues since CHCs often play an important role in insect predatoreprey relationships (Espelie et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%