2000
DOI: 10.1080/03680770.1998.11898277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator-induced life history shifts in Daphnia: a synthesis of studies using meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
89
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1D). Although most studies do not report number of juvenile instars, earlier age and smaller size at maturity in response to fish cue are commonly found (Riessen 1999), which is consistent with that hypothesis. If the fish cue indeed increases probability of maturation at an earlier instar, it is plausible that all its other effects are a consequence of this shift.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…1D). Although most studies do not report number of juvenile instars, earlier age and smaller size at maturity in response to fish cue are commonly found (Riessen 1999), which is consistent with that hypothesis. If the fish cue indeed increases probability of maturation at an earlier instar, it is plausible that all its other effects are a consequence of this shift.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Concurrently, predators of Chaoborus, such as fish, may alter aspects of Chaoborus life history by reducing foraging activity or through facultative adjustments of development (Ball and Baker 1996;Beckerman et al 2007;Riessen 1999). A reduction in activity or foraging should drive lower prey intake leading to increased time to pupation, decreased size at maturity, and/or decreased investment in reproduction-similar to the effects of defended prey.…”
Section: Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We suggest that the reduction in time to pupation and gut size represent facultative, potentially adaptive changes that reduce pre-reproductive predator exposure (Ball and Baker 1996;Riessen 1999;Beckerman et al 2007). Interestingly, as argued above, these changes may also manifest, indirectly, lower resource acquisition (e.g.…”
Section: Resource Mediation Versus Facultative Responsesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The spectrum of phenotypic expression is directly mediated by environmental selective pressures that can potentially result in different phenotypes (Pigliucci 2001;Berke et al 2013). Phenotypic differences in adult size across an environmental gradient can be explained by various biotic and abiotic pressures, such as predation pressure (Riessen 1999), resource availability (Chase 1999), and ambient temperature (Atkinson 1994). Moreover, the trait of body size can have significant and diverse ecological consequences because it has the capacity to influence many aspects of an organism's 1 3 biology including physiology, behavior, anatomy, and reproduction (Naganuma and Roughgarden 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%