1996
DOI: 10.2307/2265580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator‐‐Induced Life History Changes: Antipredator Behavior Costs or Facultative Life History Shifts?

Abstract: We used laboratory experiments to show that the nonlethal presence of pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) results in smaller size at emergence, decreased growth and development rates, and lower fecundity of the dipteran Chironomus tentans. Smaller size at metamorphosis is often viewed as a cost of antipredator behavior. However, it may also partly result from a facultative change in life history in which prey increase their development rate to escape their risky larval habitat. To determine the mechanism re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
160
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
160
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical models of metamorphosis (Wilbur and Collins 1973;Werner 1986;Rowe and Ludwig 1991) predict that reduced growth in the presence of predators should lead to metamorphosis at smaller size. These models have been supported by some empirical experiments (e.g., Skelly and Werner 1990;Peckarsky et al 1993;Ball and Baker 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Theoretical models of metamorphosis (Wilbur and Collins 1973;Werner 1986;Rowe and Ludwig 1991) predict that reduced growth in the presence of predators should lead to metamorphosis at smaller size. These models have been supported by some empirical experiments (e.g., Skelly and Werner 1990;Peckarsky et al 1993;Ball and Baker 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This kind of plastic change may be a by-product of anti-predator behaviour (Ball & Baker, 1996) or represent adaptive modifications of growth schedules per se (Beckerman et al, 2007). Within this conceptual framework, the case of E. atomaria can be considered an adaptive modification, as both growth rate and development rate are affected (see also Tammaru et al, 2000, for a related discussion of crowding effects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in resource availability can lead to better body condition and a larger body size (e.g., Du 2006, Jessop et al 2006, Wu et al 2006. Due to the costs of anti-predator behaviour, higher predation pressure can lead to early hatch-ing, lower growth and developmental rates, and thus to a smaller size at emergence or metamorphosis (e.g., Ball andBaker 1996, Laurila et al 2002). In amphibians this further negatively affects limb dimensions and locomotor performance (Goater et al 1993, Buckley et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%