2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10211-013-0147-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predation selects for low resting metabolic rate and consistent individual differences in anti-predator behavior in a beetle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found another behavioural syndrome, where the latency to respond with immobility was negatively correlated with the total duration of immobility. Overall, our results support the fact that RMR may be positively related to mortality, as recently found in land snails, juvenile squirrels, captive voles, and mealworm beetles (Alvarez & Nicieza, ; Smith & Blumstein, ; Artacho & Nespolo, ; Boratynski & Koteja, ; Larivee et al., ; Lantová et al., Krams et al., ). Repeatabilities for our four main measures (RMR, hiding behaviour, latency to become immobile, and total time spent immobile) were all statistically significant and ranged from 0.613 (latency to respond after flicking of the plastic container) to 0.926 (RMR).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We also found another behavioural syndrome, where the latency to respond with immobility was negatively correlated with the total duration of immobility. Overall, our results support the fact that RMR may be positively related to mortality, as recently found in land snails, juvenile squirrels, captive voles, and mealworm beetles (Alvarez & Nicieza, ; Smith & Blumstein, ; Artacho & Nespolo, ; Boratynski & Koteja, ; Larivee et al., ; Lantová et al., Krams et al., ). Repeatabilities for our four main measures (RMR, hiding behaviour, latency to become immobile, and total time spent immobile) were all statistically significant and ranged from 0.613 (latency to respond after flicking of the plastic container) to 0.926 (RMR).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These shifts in energy acquisition and allocation can directly impact individuals' reproductive abilities and survival (Magnhagen, 1991;Preisser et al, 2005). Trade-offs between reproductive investment and predation risk and between starvation and predation risk are thus central to many decisions individual prey make regarding habitat choice, foraging and mating (Krams et al, 2013), ultimately leading to predation risk being key to our understanding of how predators shape the life histories of prey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, often predators have a preference for larger individuals, and tadpoles of Rana sylvatica are smaller in the presence of predators . Predation can therefore act as a directional selection pressure that produces particular prey phenotypes, such as smaller size , lower metabolic rates (Handelsman et al, 2013;Krams et al, 2013) and greater locomotor performance (Watkins, 1996). All of these traits that respond to predation pressure are also sensitive to changes in temperature (Traill et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%