2015
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(128 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies demonstrating density-dependent effects may therefore have captured the effects of natural selection. Indeed, intraspecific variation in foraging traits is emerging as a potentially key factor shaping the strength of trophic cascades (Bolnick et al, 2011;Pettorelli, Hilborn, Duncan, & Durant, 2015;Sih, Cote, Evans, Fogarty, & Pruitt, 2012;Start & Gilbert, 2017). Moreover, the strength of selection imposed by predators should also vary with their densities, as the strength of selection for predator-prey interactions is expected to increase with greater prey mortality (Benkman, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies demonstrating density-dependent effects may therefore have captured the effects of natural selection. Indeed, intraspecific variation in foraging traits is emerging as a potentially key factor shaping the strength of trophic cascades (Bolnick et al, 2011;Pettorelli, Hilborn, Duncan, & Durant, 2015;Sih, Cote, Evans, Fogarty, & Pruitt, 2012;Start & Gilbert, 2017). Moreover, the strength of selection imposed by predators should also vary with their densities, as the strength of selection for predator-prey interactions is expected to increase with greater prey mortality (Benkman, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting ecological dynamics and supporting management decisions depend on our understanding of how individuals interact. It is, thus, crucial to use functional response models that fit the best with data and with mechanisms underlying interactions [6]. However, functional response models are hardly identifiable: often, different functional responses fit well to data and inferences show no or little statistical power [14,15].…”
Section: Dealing With Identifiabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last perspective of this work is about how individual interactions translate into birth and death; in other words how functional responses are related to numerical responses [6]. As most population and community dynamics models are systems of differential equations, functional responses and numerical responses are generally assumed to play at similar time scales (except when slow/fast processes are explicitly assumed).…”
Section: Assumptions and Time Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has previously focussed on the responses of prey in predator-prey interactions [4, 5, 6]. However, there is burgeoning interest in how the behaviour of predators influences population dynamics [7, 8]. There is ample evidence that both within and between-individual variation in predator behaviour influences predator-prey dynamics (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9, 10, 5, 6]. Our understanding of the degree and forms of influence is still in its infancy despite long recognition of the importance of individual variation [11, 10, 7, 12]. One major source of variation in predator behaviour and hence predation success and population dynamics is individual foraging strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%