2010
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2010.488966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Orbit Determination Standards for the Jason Series of Altimeter Missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AOD1B products estimate high-frequency nontidal mass variations due to short-term (daily and subdaily) mass transport in the atmosphere and oceans, which, if not removed, can alias into monthly gravity solutions derived from such satellite gravity missions as CHAMP (CHAllenging Mini-Satellite Payload), GRACE or GRACE-Follow-On. Cerri et al (2010) studied the contribution of the atmospheric gravity for Jason-1 when using AOD1B and spherical harmonic decomposition of atmospheric pressure over land derived at National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and found that the differences between the two are close to 1 mm root mean square (RMS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AOD1B products estimate high-frequency nontidal mass variations due to short-term (daily and subdaily) mass transport in the atmosphere and oceans, which, if not removed, can alias into monthly gravity solutions derived from such satellite gravity missions as CHAMP (CHAllenging Mini-Satellite Payload), GRACE or GRACE-Follow-On. Cerri et al (2010) studied the contribution of the atmospheric gravity for Jason-1 when using AOD1B and spherical harmonic decomposition of atmospheric pressure over land derived at National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and found that the differences between the two are close to 1 mm root mean square (RMS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been successfully demonstrated recently for the period 2002 -2012. Time variable Earth gravity field models have a strong impact on the orbit estimation for altimetry satellites and thereby on the computation of regional mean sea level trends using such orbits. In this context, Ollivier et al (2012) point to significant East-West differences for the regional mean sea level (MSL) trends computed using Envisat (the Environmental Satellite) and Jason-1 orbits for the period 2002 -2012 but based on two versions of geophysical data records (GDR) POD standards, namely GDR-C (Cerri et al, 2010) and GDR-D (OSTM/Jason-2 Products Handbook, 2011). Since these POD standards differ by the inclusion of drift terms in the geopotential models, but also by the reference frame realizations -ITRF2005 (Altamimi et al, 2007) and ITRF2008 (Altamimi et al, 2011)-and other models, it is difficult to address the source of the observed East-West differences in the regional sea level trends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform our analysis for a longer time span (1991 -2011) and, besides Envisat, include orbits of three other satellites (the European Remote Sensing Satellites ERS-1 and ERS-2 and Ocean TOPography Experiment (TOPEX)/Poseidon, Fu et al (1994)). The first of the geopotential models used is EIGEN-GL04S which is based on two years of GRACE and LAGEOS data and which was used as a background model to compute the GDR-C orbits for Jason-1/2 and Envisat (Cerri et al, 2010) and the REAPER orbits (Rudenko et al, 2012) of ERS-1 and ERS-2. This model containing no drift terms for the geopotential coefficients has been chosen as a benchmark in our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A radial accuracy of these orbits is 1.5 to 2.0 cm. This resulted in the creation of a new version of the geophysical data records (GDR) standards, namely, GDR-C standards [10] based on the IERS Conventions 2003, ITRF2005 terrestrial reference frame, EIGEN-GL04S [23] geopotential model, and other models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%