2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iedm13553.2020.9371990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision of synaptic weights programmed in phase-change memory devices for deep learning inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2(d) for 16 distinct levels. The analog nature of the device, however, allows the encoding of more levels, the only limit being ADC precision and allowable programming time [35], [36].…”
Section: Unit Cell and Array Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(d) for 16 distinct levels. The analog nature of the device, however, allows the encoding of more levels, the only limit being ADC precision and allowable programming time [35], [36].…”
Section: Unit Cell and Array Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another contributor to programming inaccuracy is 1/f read noise [16], [17] which is not considered in this study. Recent work by Nandakumar et al show that the achievable programming precision will eventually be limited by the read noise [18].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mapping the sliced weight matrix W to the PCM crossbar array, each weight slice is mapped to a differential PCM pair [34]. We assume a closed loop iterative programming with a read delay t 0 of 25 s and maximum conductance range G max of 25 μS [35]. Hence, each weight slice range r s_W is linearly mapped to the conductance range to obtain target conductance values G T .…”
Section: Pcm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%