2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-19605-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision of a new ocular biometer in children and comparison with IOLMaster

Abstract: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of AL-Scan in agreement with those by the IOLMaster in healthy children, two skilled operators measured ocular parameters in 58 children. The parameters included keratometry (K) values, anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), pupil diameter (PD), and corneal diameter (CD). The cohort comprised of 32 boys and 26 girls. The AL-Scan measurements showed high repeatability, as the test-retest repeatability (TRT) values of AL, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the current study was the first to assess interobserver reproducibility of this new biometer. Our results showed high reproducibility for AL measurements (CoV = 0.09%, ICC=1.000), and was similar to the study using another optical biometer performed by Yu et al ( 21 ) (CoV = 0.09%, ICC = 1.000). Agreement between PCI and SS-OCT for AL was high, with a mean difference of only −0.03 ± 0.03 mm, which was not clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To our knowledge, the current study was the first to assess interobserver reproducibility of this new biometer. Our results showed high reproducibility for AL measurements (CoV = 0.09%, ICC=1.000), and was similar to the study using another optical biometer performed by Yu et al ( 21 ) (CoV = 0.09%, ICC = 1.000). Agreement between PCI and SS-OCT for AL was high, with a mean difference of only −0.03 ± 0.03 mm, which was not clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These values of Sw found for the keratometry are similar to those reported using the Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland) biometer in children, around 0.02 mm for both main corneal meridians [ 12 ]. Likewise, the Sw values for the corneal radius reported for the AL-Scan (Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) and the IOL Master 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) devices were between 0.08 D and 0.11 D in children [ 13 , 14 ]. In the present study, the Sw for the keratometry (K1 and K2), calculated in terms of refractive power, would be of 0.10 D, approximately, a value comparable to that reported using the IOL Master 700 device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the above mentioned studies were done on adults and to the best of our knowledge this is the first study to look at the agreement of these two non contact biometers among children. Among the pediatric population, a recent study by Chen et al [18] compared axial length, anterior corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth measurements between IOL Master and AL- Scan (Nidek Co.,). The mean difference in AL was close to zero (LoA -0.05 to 0.05) and the mean difference in keratometry was reported to be -0.13D (LoA -0.37 to 0.10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%