Precision Drip Irrigation on Hot Pepper in Arid Northwest China Area

Yang, Huiying; Liu, Haijun; Li, Yan; Wang, Fengxin

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18336-2_22

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…WP can easily play this role with its mulch effect. Many researchers have come up with this conclusion (Yang et al, 2011;Singh and Kamal, 2012;Ahmed et al, 2014). The average gross composition and quality criteria of pepper affected by different irrigation treatments of this study are the same (89.6%) reported by Hayoğlu (1999) for Şanlıurfa pepper.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Su yastığı sulama yönteminin kırmızı acı biberin bazı kalite özelliklerine etkisi

Gerçek

Çömlekçioğlu

2020

Harran Tarım Ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was carried out to determine the effects of water pillow irrigation method on quality attributes (water soluble dry matter content, moisture, protein, ash and L-ascorbic acid) of hot red pepper. Fruit yield and quality obtained under water pillow (WP) irrigation were compared with those under furrow irrigation (FI). Experiments were carried out under semi-arid climate conditions of Turkey. The irrigation intervals were 5-day for FI and 7, 9 and 11-days for WP. The amounts of applied irrigation water were found to be 1718.1, 1160.2, 906.1 and 761.4 mm for FI, WP7, WP9 and WP11, respectively. Fruit water soluble dry matter contents varied between 9.5%-11.2%, moisture contents between 86.3-91.5%, pH between 4.40-4.80, protein contents between 1.32-1.38%, ash contents between 0.98-1.09%, and Lascorbic acid contents between 105-118 mg 100 g-1. Although the amount of irrigation water used in WP11 treatment was 125% less than the amount used in FI treatment, no significant differences were observed in quality traits of both irrigation methods as well as capsaicin contents and extractable color of the samples.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%