2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19163583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Pollen Grain Detection in Bright Field Microscopy Using Deep Learning Techniques

Abstract: The determination of daily concentrations of atmospheric pollen is important in the medical and biological fields. Obtaining pollen concentrations is a complex and time-consuming task for specialized personnel. The automatic location of pollen grains is a handicap due to the high complexity of the images to be processed, with polymorphic and clumped pollen grains, dust, or debris. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of implementing a reliable pollen grain detection system based on a convolu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New developments in microscopic pollen detection using deep learning techniques (Gallardo-Caballero et al, 2019) or in full-length amplicon or genome sequencing with, for example, nanopore sequencing techniques (Lang et al 2019;Leidenfrost et al, 2020;Peel et al, 2019) could improve the weaknesses of both approaches (e.g., time expenditure in microscopy or quantification accuracy in molecular methods). However, studies are needed to compare and evaluate the accuracy of those new developments.…”
Section: Relationships Between Quantitative Outcomes Of Metabarcodimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New developments in microscopic pollen detection using deep learning techniques (Gallardo-Caballero et al, 2019) or in full-length amplicon or genome sequencing with, for example, nanopore sequencing techniques (Lang et al 2019;Leidenfrost et al, 2020;Peel et al, 2019) could improve the weaknesses of both approaches (e.g., time expenditure in microscopy or quantification accuracy in molecular methods). However, studies are needed to compare and evaluate the accuracy of those new developments.…”
Section: Relationships Between Quantitative Outcomes Of Metabarcodimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent technological developments have made automatic pollen sampling and identification possible (Buters et al 2018), for example, with recognition systems using microscopic images of pollen grains (Boucher et al 2002;Ranzato et al 2007;Oteros et al 2015), pollen color patterns from pollen images (Landsmeer et al 2009), fluorescence emission signals, (Swanson and Huffman 2018;Mitsumoto et al 2009;Mitsumoto et al 2010;Richardson et al 2019), light scattering (Crouzy et al 2016;Šaulienė et al 2019Šaulienė et al , holographic images (Sauvageat et al 2019, size and morphological characteristics (O'Connor et al 2013), real-time PCR (Longhi et al 2009), texture and infrared patterns of microscopic images of pollen (Marcos et al 2015;Gottardini et al 2007;Chen et al 2006), or a combination of several of these. Many studies applied machine learning algorithms to the problem (Punyasena et al 2012;Tcheng et al 2016;Crouzy et al 2016;Gonçalves et al 2016;Gallardo-Caballero et al 2019;Šaulienė et al 2019). These automated pollen identification methods have been applied not only to aerobiological research but also to palynological studies for the identification of fossilized pollen (France et al 2000;Kaya et al 2014;Li et al 2004;Zhang et al 2004;Rodríguez-Daminán et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce proportional bias, Tello et al ( 2018 ) also implemented an approach based on dimensional and shape characteristics of identified grains. Separating overlapping objects is a complicated task, but capabilities in computer vision are steadily improving and possible solutions are starting to appear in the literature (Gallardo-Caballero et al 2019 ; Cohen et al 2017 ; Molnar et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training set for the supervised classification process should be at least made of 40 objects for each class. Random forest usually offers a good balance between computing time and classification accuracy, nevertheless other models should be considered and tested for specific needs (Kuhn 2008 ; Gallardo-Caballero et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%