2021
DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2020.617713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Genome Editing in miRNA Target Site via Gene Targeting and Subsequent Single-Strand-Annealing-Mediated Excision of the Marker Gene in Plants

Abstract: Gene targeting (GT) enables precise genome modification—e.g., the introduction of base substitutions—using donor DNA as a template. Combined with clean excision of the selection marker used to select GT cells, GT is expected to become a standard, generally applicable, base editing system. Previously, we demonstrated marker excision via a piggyBac transposon from GT-modified loci in rice. However, piggyBac-mediated marker excision has the limitation that it recognizes only the sequence TTAA. Recently, we propos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 83 ] Although natural SSA repair leads to sequence losses and chromosomal translocations or rearrangement, its mechanism could still be adopted to facilitate CRISPR/Cas‐based GT for removing selection markers. [ 21,22,84 ]…”
Section: Potential Usage Of Ssa In Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 83 ] Although natural SSA repair leads to sequence losses and chromosomal translocations or rearrangement, its mechanism could still be adopted to facilitate CRISPR/Cas‐based GT for removing selection markers. [ 21,22,84 ]…”
Section: Potential Usage Of Ssa In Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 90,91 ] However, the requirement of the TTAA motif at a predefined site for editing limits its application to some extent. [ 22,84 ]…”
Section: Potential Usage Of Ssa In Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSA is one of the DNA DSB repair systems that use duplicated repeat sequences. This can be applied to any target sequence in principle, but the frequency of marker elimination by SSA is lower than that mediated by the piggyBac transposon (Endo et al, 2020; Ohtsuki et al, 2020). To date, reproducible reports of gene modification via positive–negative selection‐mediated GT are limited to rice.…”
Section: Precise Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to PiggyBac, this strategy leaves no footprint. Toki showed that this positive selection marker system can introduce mutations in the MIR172 binding site in rice 45 . Positive/negative selection–mediated gene targeting and subsequent removal of the positive selection marker using either the piggyBAC transposon or break‐induced SSA can be used to achieve any desired mutation without the need for sequence‐specific nucleases.…”
Section: Plant Genome‐editing Tools and Technology Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%