2003
DOI: 10.2343/geochemj.37.531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise determination of PGE in a GSJ reference sample JP-1 by ID-ICPMS after nickel sulfide fire assay preconcentration

Abstract: All platinum group element (PGE) abundances of a standard rock JP-1 are determined by isotope dilution method (for Ru, Pd, Os, Ir and Pt) and external calibration method (only for Rh) using ICP-MS combined with a fire assay preconcentration technique. The errors range 13-25% (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 10 mg of the powder was used for determining REEs, whereas about 200 mg sample was used for PGE in consideration of the heterogeneity of PGE. These analytical procedures were described in Latif et al (1999), Shirai et al (2003), Shinotuska and Ebihara (1997), and for PGA, INAA, ICP-MS of REE, and ICP-MS of PGE, respectively.…”
Section: Samples and Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 10 mg of the powder was used for determining REEs, whereas about 200 mg sample was used for PGE in consideration of the heterogeneity of PGE. These analytical procedures were described in Latif et al (1999), Shirai et al (2003), Shinotuska and Ebihara (1997), and for PGA, INAA, ICP-MS of REE, and ICP-MS of PGE, respectively.…”
Section: Samples and Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the concentration obtained is internally consistent, it is lower compared to the currently preferred value of 6.5 ppb (Imai et al, 1995), but it should be noted that this value was derived from only two data sets (9.7 ppb and 3.3 ppb). A more recent work reported a concentration of 6.1 ppb (Shirai et al, 2003), which lies between the two previous values, while Rehkämper et al (1999) reported Ru concentrations ranging from 1.07 ppb up to 4.67 ppb in Horoman peridotites, which is the same sampling location as that of JP-1. These widely scattered concentrations determined for JP-1 make it difficult to decide which is the "true" Ru abundance for this reference rock.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The most likely reason for the large discrepancy in the Ru abundance is heterogeneity in the JP-1 reference material. Such a conclusion can be reached from the chemical similarity of Ru and Os (Lee et al, 2003), and previous reports of heterogeneity of Os content in JP-1 (Shirai et al, 2003;Suzuki and Tatsumi, 2001). As such it would be reasonable for the heterogeneity of the Os to also be seen for Ru.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final solution was prepared by diluting to 15 ml with deionized water. The analytical procedures are essentially identical to those described in Shirai et al (2003).…”
Section: Sample and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%