“…The development of U-Th dating techniques has largely focussed on improving the analytical precision and accuracy of determinations made on materials dating from beyond the last interglacial, on improving the sensitivity and reducing the size of sample required for dating, on increasing sample throughput and, more recently, on high-resolution in situ dating of high-U samples (Halliday et al, 1995;Stirling et al, 1995Stirling et al, , 2000Stirling et al, , 2001Rehkä mper et al, 2001;Shen et al, 2002;Goldstein and Stirling, 2003;Hellstrom, 2003;Albarè de et al, 2004;Andersen et al, 2004;Eggins et al, 2005;Potter et al, 2005a,b;McCulloch and Mortimer, 2008). Recent advances in MC-ICPMS have greatly enhanced sample throughput for U-Th dating and age precision for samples of >300 ka old as a result of the capacity of the procedure to correct for mass bias on Th isotopic measurements.…”