2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise and accurate 186Os/188Os and 187Os/188Os measurements by multi-collector plasma ionisation mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS) part I: Solution analyses

Abstract: We present new high precision Os isotope data obtained by solution-mode MC-ICP-MS for 4 different Os isotope reference materials and compare the data to that obtained by the N-TIMS method. Mass fractionation effects for MC-ICP-MS are evaluated and we demonstrate excellent adherence to the exponential law. An improved and robust method for the derivation of interfering element isotope ratios is presented and evaluated via analysis of solutions with widely varying interfering element/analyte ratios. We show expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2008, Li et al. 2010), and the measurement uncertainties obtained with solution nebulisation are sometimes comparable to those obtained by N‐TIMS (Makishima and Nakamura 2006, Nowell et al. 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…2008, Li et al. 2010), and the measurement uncertainties obtained with solution nebulisation are sometimes comparable to those obtained by N‐TIMS (Makishima and Nakamura 2006, Nowell et al. 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…, Walczyk , Nowell et al . ). The MC‐ICP‐MS/ICP‐MS permits faster isotope ratio determination and simpler elemental purification chemistry.…”
Section: Total Procedural Blanks Of Rhenium and Osmium And 187os/188mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mass bias behavior of Lu was assumed to follow that of Yb. Thus, for analyses with a 173 Yb signal of <150 mV, the Yb and Lu isotopic ratios were corrected using the respective bHf of the individual integration steps (n = 55) divided by the average bHf/bYb offset factor of the complete analytical session (c.f., JWG method in Slama et al, 2008). For analyses with a 173 Yb signal >150 mV, the bHf/bYb offset factor was calculated using the mean bYb of the individual analyses.…”
Section: Lu-hf Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%