2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation printing towards diverse materials, mechanical tailoring and functional devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This low relative permittivity is attributed to the low density of the precipitation-printed PVDF (0.646 ± 0.012 g cm −3 ), which has 64% porosity compared with fully dense PVDF (Figure S7a). 41 Despite hot pressing, which reduced the porosity of the printed PVDF to 7% (1.66 ± 0.01 g cm −3 density compared to that of fully dense PVDF, which is 1.78 g cm −3 and the scanning electron microscopy image is shown in Figure S7b), 18 the relative permittivity of the hot-pressed PVDF samples is measured to be 5.20 at 1 kHz frequency, which is 57% of that of the solvent-cast film. This result indicates that voids present in printed PVDF are only compressed to smaller volumes by hot pressing, as the influence of voids on PVDF permittivity cannot be eliminated completely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This low relative permittivity is attributed to the low density of the precipitation-printed PVDF (0.646 ± 0.012 g cm −3 ), which has 64% porosity compared with fully dense PVDF (Figure S7a). 41 Despite hot pressing, which reduced the porosity of the printed PVDF to 7% (1.66 ± 0.01 g cm −3 density compared to that of fully dense PVDF, which is 1.78 g cm −3 and the scanning electron microscopy image is shown in Figure S7b), 18 the relative permittivity of the hot-pressed PVDF samples is measured to be 5.20 at 1 kHz frequency, which is 57% of that of the solvent-cast film. This result indicates that voids present in printed PVDF are only compressed to smaller volumes by hot pressing, as the influence of voids on PVDF permittivity cannot be eliminated completely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the average d 33 coefficient of printed and 75 MV m −1 -poled samples remains relatively low compared to that of fully dense PVDF sheets because the precipitation-printed PVDF only has a density of 0.646 g cm −3 (64% porosity). 41 Therefore, printed then hotpressed PVDF specimens were also tested to evaluate the influence of porosity on the piezoelectric effect. The d 33 coefficient of printed then hot-pressed PVDF after 75 MV m −1 electric field poling is improved up to −6.42 ± 0.78 pC N −1 , a 550% increase relative to directly printed PVDF and poled under the same conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the solvent acts as a porogen through polymer precipitation-based 3D printing. This technique uses the difference in polymer solubility between two mutually miscible solvents to inject a solvent dissolved polymer into a vat of a non-solvent to evoke rapid polymer solidification in situ [ 113 ]. By varying the solvent/polymer ratio within this immersion precipitation 3D printing (ip3DP) , tunable porous structures can be created from a range of dissolvable polymers[ 114 ].…”
Section: Extrusion-based 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extruder is placed on a three-dimensional CNC table that moves in the x, y and z directions and places the molten polymer inside the extruder on the part [31,32]. After nishing one layer, the extruder moves upwards as thick as one layer [33][34][35][36][37]. It is important to note that many parameters affect the quality and nal properties of a sample printed with FDM [38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%