2018
DOI: 10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_76_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preanalytic determinants of surgical pathology practice in Uyo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the previous studies ( 2 , 12 , 16 ), and also the study feasibility in our setting, requests for cytological examination and also those received from the outpatient clinics of the hospital were all excluded (although we acknowledge that they are also subject to misinterpretation without clinical information). Each request form was visually assessed for the presence and completeness of the following necessary items: patients’ full name, age, gender and contact number, clinical history, provisional/differential diagnosis, anatomical site of the specimen, specimen description, relevant laboratory, imaging and endoscopic findings, and the full name and contact number of the requesting clinicians, as studied in other studies ( 3 , 14 , 16 , 17 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the previous studies ( 2 , 12 , 16 ), and also the study feasibility in our setting, requests for cytological examination and also those received from the outpatient clinics of the hospital were all excluded (although we acknowledge that they are also subject to misinterpretation without clinical information). Each request form was visually assessed for the presence and completeness of the following necessary items: patients’ full name, age, gender and contact number, clinical history, provisional/differential diagnosis, anatomical site of the specimen, specimen description, relevant laboratory, imaging and endoscopic findings, and the full name and contact number of the requesting clinicians, as studied in other studies ( 3 , 14 , 16 , 17 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%