2016
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.144253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease with cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic features improves risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(34 reference statements)
3
36
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite similar immunophenotypes, the differing cytogenetics in our twins could be due to additional mutational “hits” (secondary events) in twin A. The presence of pre‐HCT MRD was likely the determining prognostic factor, as persistent pre‐HCT MRD is associated with poor outcomes in pediatric and adult AML …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Despite similar immunophenotypes, the differing cytogenetics in our twins could be due to additional mutational “hits” (secondary events) in twin A. The presence of pre‐HCT MRD was likely the determining prognostic factor, as persistent pre‐HCT MRD is associated with poor outcomes in pediatric and adult AML …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Note, Flu/Mel conditioning was associated with lower relapse rate compared with fludarabine and busulfan conditioning . While this conditioning did not overcome the negative impact of MRD positivity in HLA‐matched transplants, in haplo‐SCT the opposite appears to be the case. This supports the idea that a stronger GVL effect might exist with haploidentical grafts, and raises the question whether the negative MRD on transplant outcomes can be potentially mitigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results can improve prognostication accuracy in patients referred for HCT in MRD‐negative state. Previous studies of MRD in the transplant setting either did not consider prior consolidation in analysis or had too few patients without consolidation . On the other hand, previous studies showing no impact of consolidation did not take MRD status into account and the heterogeneity in MRD status might have masked the effect of consolidation specifically in MRD‐negative patients .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is associated with a reduced risk of relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). 1,2 Furthermore, MRD status at the time of HCT is arguably the most important prognostic determinant of relapse risk, dominating a number of other potential prognostic factors (e.g., cytogenetic risk group, graft source, conditioning intensity). 1,3 However, still about 30% of patients who undergo allo-HCT in a MRD-negative state relapse, 1 We hypothesized that among MRD-negative patients, where MRD status is no longer a variable, specifics of previous treatments may reflect varying depths of remission and hence be prognostic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%