2017
DOI: 10.1080/0144929x.2016.1266388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-service teachers’ skills and perceptions about the use of virtual learning environments to improve teaching and learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Chile, studies on immersive technologies are mostly carried out at the tertiary levels [14][15][16], and findings in K-12 are rather scarce, especially using technology with students with special educational needs [17,18]. In this context, the research problem derives from the necessity to study educational possibilities provided by the curricular integration of immersive technology such as augmented reality and its effect on academic achievement in a diverse class of secondary students taking chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chile, studies on immersive technologies are mostly carried out at the tertiary levels [14][15][16], and findings in K-12 are rather scarce, especially using technology with students with special educational needs [17,18]. In this context, the research problem derives from the necessity to study educational possibilities provided by the curricular integration of immersive technology such as augmented reality and its effect on academic achievement in a diverse class of secondary students taking chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that students with high self‐efficacy use more advanced learning strategies; invest more effort in their studies; show more confidence, commitment and persistence in the task; and show future self‐efficacy regarding new tasks (Wilson & Narayan, 2016). Teachers, students and preservice teachers reported that technical difficulties were the most prevalent obstacle encountered when they experienced VW, and teachers reported that these difficulties might dissuade them from using VW in the future (Badilla Quintana et al ., 2017; Lin et al ., 2014; Nussli & Oh, 2016; Ramirez et al ., 2018). However, our data suggests that efficient management of the course and maintaining a high level of discussion and activities further amplify future‐use intentions (Table 7, Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some users enjoyed using the system but preferred face‐to‐face learning (Holmberg & Huvila, 2008). Most complained about technical difficulties which included, among others, lack of adequate technological resources, inadequate bandwidth, slow response time, program freezes and crashes, a nonintuitive interface, a need to update the system frequently, difficulty in activating parts of the program, following the large groups of students, coping with multiple tasks and lack of technical support (Badilla Quintana, Sagredo, & Lytras, 2017; Gregory et al ., 2015; Lin, Wang, Grant, Chien, & Lan, 2014; Mayrath et al ., 2010; Ramirez, Rico, Riofrỉo‐Luzcando, Berrocal‐Lobo, & de Antonio, 2018; Swier & Peterson, 2018). Furthermore, some users stated that the system had no clear goal, no apparent relationship to learning, increased distractions and the risk of being exposed to undesirable content.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLEs are understood from two influential approaches: pedagogical and technological [12,31]. The pedagogical approach defines PLE as a change in educational methodology that promotes self-learning through the use of different resources.…”
Section: Tools and Strategies In Plementioning
confidence: 99%