The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10062046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Disaster Social Capital and Disaster Recovery in Wenchuan Earthquake-Stricken Rural Communities

Abstract: This study examined the impact of social capital on disaster recovery in the 2008 earthquake-stricken rural communities in Wenchuan, China. The results show that quake-affected households having more social capital recovered more easily and quickly from disasters. A larger network significantly increased the amount of government aid received for housing reconstruction. This indicates that network members assist the quake-affected households to apply for and obtain government aid. These findings imply that soci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the politics of infrastructures is a niche of its own e.g., (Barker 2017 ), what is less emphasized in mainstream political discourse are the social infrastructures, the social capital of communities representing the value of their collective civic, cultural and political realities. Such social capital, as detailed below, can play a substantial role in enabling community-based disaster response and recovery processes (Nakagawa and Shaw 2004 ; Sadeka et al 2015 ; Sadri et al 2017 ; Masud-All-Kamal and Monirul Hassan 2018 ; Wei and Han 2018 ; Gallagher et al 2019 ). It is often social capital (e.g., often examined through network analysis) that enables access to the material infrastructures (Aldrich and Meyer 2015 ), and it can be social capital that creates a foundation for community resilience to disasters as a form of ‘social preparedness’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the politics of infrastructures is a niche of its own e.g., (Barker 2017 ), what is less emphasized in mainstream political discourse are the social infrastructures, the social capital of communities representing the value of their collective civic, cultural and political realities. Such social capital, as detailed below, can play a substantial role in enabling community-based disaster response and recovery processes (Nakagawa and Shaw 2004 ; Sadeka et al 2015 ; Sadri et al 2017 ; Masud-All-Kamal and Monirul Hassan 2018 ; Wei and Han 2018 ; Gallagher et al 2019 ). It is often social capital (e.g., often examined through network analysis) that enables access to the material infrastructures (Aldrich and Meyer 2015 ), and it can be social capital that creates a foundation for community resilience to disasters as a form of ‘social preparedness’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the improvement of trust and social connections can facilitate the reconstruction of families and communities affected by disasters [ 17 , 37 ]. Social capital has an important impact on residents’ life satisfaction by enhancing social ties and cohesion; that is, families with more social capital recover more easily and faster, rebuilding resources through formal and informal networks of relationships [ 39 , 40 ]. Survivors reconstruct their life satisfaction through individual social networks, thereby mitigating the negative impacts of earthquake damage and using their social networks to rebuild their lives to fit their idea of a good life [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recovery phase, bonds with friends and a feeling of belonging in the community lessens the mental and physical harm due to a disaster. To illustrate, households with larger Spring Festival networks were more likely to rebuild their home after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake [31].…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%