2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-017-9371-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-course student performance prediction with multi-instance multi-label learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent works have focused on novel methods to make timely predictions. For example, Ma et al [16] formulated the task of pre-course student performance prediction as a multi-instance multi-label (MIML) problem. They proved that it was desirable to predict each student's performance on a certain course before its commencement rather than after finishing it.…”
Section: Student Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent works have focused on novel methods to make timely predictions. For example, Ma et al [16] formulated the task of pre-course student performance prediction as a multi-instance multi-label (MIML) problem. They proved that it was desirable to predict each student's performance on a certain course before its commencement rather than after finishing it.…”
Section: Student Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meier et al [17] used homework, test scores, and course project completion information to predict students' final grades four weeks after the course started. Some studies [22,23] considered students' performance in the midterm exams of the course, leading to the prediction of performance only after halfway through the teaching process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work most related to ours is that by Ma et al [22,39], who used a multi-label multiinstance algorithm to predict pre-class student performance, but during data preprocessing, some curriculum features that were considered irrelevant were forcefully removed, and the correlation among features, and between features and labels, was not fully considered, and some possible relevant course feature information was directly ignored. For example, some selective courses may have a certain effect on subsequent professional ones, and the direct deletion of selective course information may lead to some feature effects that weaken the predictive performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study defined two behavioral characteristics of orderliness and diligence and analyzed the correlation between the regularity of campus life and academic performance. Reference [2] proposed a preclass student performance prediction method based on multiexample multilabel learning. The idea of this method is to use students' behavior in completed courses to predict their difficulties in learning new courses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%