2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-commercial thinning effects on growth, yield and mortality in even-aged paper birch stands in British Columbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
5
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that plant competition for resources was conspicuous during the observation period, which reached a point where thinning was necessary. This finding coincides with typical pre-commercial thinning of 10-20-year-old stands [45][46][47] and should be delayed to about 15 years for trees on sites with poor physical conditions [48]. Event history analysis provides more precise timing for management practices.…”
Section: Event History Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This indicates that plant competition for resources was conspicuous during the observation period, which reached a point where thinning was necessary. This finding coincides with typical pre-commercial thinning of 10-20-year-old stands [45][46][47] and should be delayed to about 15 years for trees on sites with poor physical conditions [48]. Event history analysis provides more precise timing for management practices.…”
Section: Event History Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We inferred that thinning promoted foliage biomass accumulation, but the type of distribution might vary with tree age; therefore, this phenomenon does not apply to all trees after thinning. Previous studies have revealed that thinning creates more space and a lighter environment for branch development, especially within lower crowns (Ginn et al 1991;Yu et al 2003;Simard et al 2004). Our findings indicate that the VAR model is a useful tool for quantifying the vertical distribution of crown mass, which can help interpret the differences in the distribution of the crown mass resulting from thinning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower stocking rate will delay canopy closure, increase branch size and slow down the process of self-pruning (e.g. Cameron 1996;Schatz et al 2008), while at the same time favouring stem diameter development (Erdmann et al 1975;Niemistö 1995;Simard et al 2004;Rytter 2013). Branch traits are considered in birch breeding since branch characters such as angle, thickness and numbers are all under intermediate genetic control (Stener and Jansson 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20-30% removal of the green crown. Height growth is generally influenced less than diameter growth by a reduced crown (Vuokila 1968;Stoddard and Stoddard 1987) in the same way that light competition reduces stem development (Niemistö 1995;Cameron et al 1995;Simard et al 2004;Rytter and Werner 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%