2021
DOI: 10.1093/jeea/jvab050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Colonial Religious Institutions and Development: Evidence through a Military Coup

Abstract: This paper offers a novel illustration of the political economy of religion by examining the impact of religious elites on development. We compile a unique database on holy Muslim shrines across Pakistani Punjab and construct a historical panel of literacy spanning over a century (1901-2011). Using the 1977 military take-over as a universal shock that gave control over public goods to politicians, our difference-in-differences analysis shows that areas with a greater concentration of shrines experienced a subs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same families have historically acted as natural contenders for political power and have participated in elections held under both colonial rule and Ayub's era (Ewing 1983;Gilmartin 1988). However, the Zia era marked a decisive shift in their politicisation and propelled a significantly larger number of shrine families into electoral politics, as illustrated in the next section (Malik and Malik 2017;Malik and Mirza 2022). One might think that Zia, himself a devout Muslim, gave prime importance to enlisting the support of shrine families.…”
Section: Why Did Dynastic Politics First Increase Under Zia?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same families have historically acted as natural contenders for political power and have participated in elections held under both colonial rule and Ayub's era (Ewing 1983;Gilmartin 1988). However, the Zia era marked a decisive shift in their politicisation and propelled a significantly larger number of shrine families into electoral politics, as illustrated in the next section (Malik and Malik 2017;Malik and Mirza 2022). One might think that Zia, himself a devout Muslim, gave prime importance to enlisting the support of shrine families.…”
Section: Why Did Dynastic Politics First Increase Under Zia?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same families have historically acted as natural contenders for political power and have participated in elections held under both colonial rule and Ayub's era (Ewing 1983;Gilmartin 1988). However, the Zia era marked a decisive shift in their politicisation and propelled a significantly larger number of shrine families into electoral politics, as illustrated in the next section (Malik and Malik 2017;Malik and Mirza 2022). One might think that Zia, himself a devout Muslim, gave prime importance to enlisting the support of shrine families.…”
Section: Why Did Dynastic Politics First Increase Under Zia?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descendant effect dominates the founder effect thereby resulting in an overall negative effect of dynasties. This suggests that when the subsequent generations of politicians enter into politics, their performance deteriorates to the point that residents of their constituencies become poorer and are left with fewer public goods (George and Ponattu, 2019;Malik, et al 2021).…”
Section: Conceptional Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, an ideal strategy, in this case, is to compare one set of close election winners with another set of such winners. Accordingly, we compare the performance of dynastic members of national assembly (MNAs) who defeat non-dynastic candidates by a close margin with that of non-dynastic MNAs who defeat dynastic candidates by a similar close margin while using a Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) (Galasso and Nannicini, 2011;Malik, et al 2021). As winning an election by a close margin is likely to be random, the use of close elections as an identification strategy minimises the effects of observable and non-observable politicians' characteristics on the probability of winning an election.…”
Section: Identification Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation