2005
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amh040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pragmalinguistic Awareness: Is it Related to Motivation and Proficiency?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Niezgoda and Röver (2001, as cited in Keihanyan, 2009) mentioned that motivated learners are more sensitive to grammatical errors. Cook (2001, as cited in Takahashi, 2005) also pointed out that learners who are more motivated can notice pragmatic functions of language. Moreover, Tateyama (2001, as cited in Takahashi, 2005) found that learners who are highly motivated demonstrated better performance in role plays.…”
Section: B Previous Studies On Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Niezgoda and Röver (2001, as cited in Keihanyan, 2009) mentioned that motivated learners are more sensitive to grammatical errors. Cook (2001, as cited in Takahashi, 2005) also pointed out that learners who are more motivated can notice pragmatic functions of language. Moreover, Tateyama (2001, as cited in Takahashi, 2005) found that learners who are highly motivated demonstrated better performance in role plays.…”
Section: B Previous Studies On Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some inconsistencies (e.g., Takahashi, 2005;Vandergrift, 2005), a number of studies (e.g., Ehrman & Oxford, 1995; see also Masgoret & Gardner, 2003) found positive significant associations between more self-determined motivational orientations and L2 achievement (e.g., Noels et al, 2001;Wu, 2003). In a sample of 329 learners of English (age range: 18-20) recruited from non-English majors at a Chinese university, Wang (2008), for example, found that motivational orientations explained 26% of the variance in student achievement: Whereas more self-determined orientations positively correlated with the end-of-the course L2 achievement, the correlation with external regulation was negative.…”
Section: Motivational Orientations L2 Proficiency and Other L2 Antementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While correlational and regression analyses produced inconsistent results -with some studies reporting significant relationships among motivational orientations and L2 proficiency measures (Ehrman & Oxford, 1995;Wang, 2008) and other studies finding these relationships to be not significant (Takahashi, 2005;Vandergrift, 2005) -a number of studies using structural equation modeling techniques (Ardasheva, 2011;Bernaus & Gardner, 2008;Pae, 2008) found that the motivational orientation's effects on L2 proficiency measures were indirect, that is, mediated by other individual difference variables. These findings suggest a potential benefit for using structural equation modeling applications in future motivational research.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the procedures of King andSilver ( 1993) andTakahashi (2001), the treatment session was divided into two segments: 1) a cross-cultural segment com parison (experimental and control groups), and 2) metapragmatic instruction (experimental group only), followed by communicative practice. More specifically, during the pedagogical interven tion the learners in the experimental group were exposed to pragmatic input (lexical and syntactic mitigators in refusal responses) and were made aware (through explicit teaching) of the pragmatic functions of mitigators in refusal responses in formal and informal situations.…”
Section: Pedagogical Intervention: Treatment Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%