Practice Management and Health Policy Education in Radiology: An Emerging Imperative

DeQuesada, Ivan M.; Chokshi, Falgun H.; Mullins, Mark E.; Duszak, Richard

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.004

Cited by 12 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…39 However, longer and more comprehensive programs may greatly burden physicians already fatigued from the length of their prior education and training and those with many professional and personal responsibilities. 7,11 Mentoring, coaching, and networking with peers or senior leaders are other existing options for physicians working within larger healthcare systems. 9 However, these options are often lacking for physicians managing rural populations and independent practices.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

<p>An Unmet Need in Healthcare Leadership: A Survey of Practicing Physicians’ Perspectives on Healthcare Delivery Science Education</p>

Weeks¹,

Hansen²,

Merritt³

et al. 2020

JHL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Healthcare delivery science education (HDSE) is increasingly needed by physicians balancing clinical care, practice management, and leadership responsibilities in their daily lives. However, most practicing physicians have received little HDSE in undergraduate through residency training. The purpose of this study is to 1) quantify the perception of the need for HDSE and interest in HDSE among a diverse sample of physicians, and 2) determine if perspectives on HDSE vary by specialty, rurality, and years in practice. Methods: Using a cross-sectional, single state, mailed questionnaire, we surveyed 170 physicians about their perspectives on HDSE and interest in an HDSE program. Descriptive statistics and a multivariable logistic regression are presented. Results: Among the 70.5% of responding eligible physicians, 75% of physicians had less HDSE than they would like and 90% were interested in obtaining more HDSE. Thirty-five percent of physicians were interested in joining the described HDSE program. The most prevalent barriers to obtaining HDSE were a lack of time and existing programs. Physician perspectives were similar across specialties, years in practice, and rurality. Conclusion: There is a high unmet need for HDSE among physicians. Diverse and innovative HDSE programming needs to be developed to meet this need. Programming should be developed not only for physicians but also for undergraduate through residency training programs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, existing alternative formal didactic opportunities are limited and often time-intensive. 11 , 12 Without formal training, many physicians utilize the most accessible solutions such as trial-and-error. This can lead to a double loss of hospital leadership potential and physicians’ skilled time.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>An Unmet Need in Healthcare Leadership: A Survey of Practicing Physicians’ Perspectives on Healthcare Delivery Science Education</p>

Weeks¹,

Hansen²,

Merritt³

et al. 2020

JHL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All studies were conducted in the United States, with four prospective case series 13,22,23,26 and two retrospective case series. 24,25 Most studies included residents across their postgraduate years (PGY-1 to PGY-5).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leadership Development Programs for Radiology Residents: A Literature Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Leadership development has become increasingly important in medical education, including postgraduate training in the specialty of radiology. Since leadership skills may be acquired, there is a need to establish leadership education in radiology residency training. However, there is a paucity of literature examining the design, delivery, and evaluation of such programs. The purpose of this study is to collate and characterize leadership training programs across postgraduate radiology residencies found in the literature. Methods: A scoping review was conducted. Relevant articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC databases from inception until June 22, 2020. English-language studies characterizing leadership training programs offered during postgraduate radiology residency were included. A search of the grey literature was completed via a web-based search for target programs within North America. Results: The literature search yielded 1168 citations, with 6 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Four studies were prospective case series and two were retrospective. There was heterogeneity regarding program structure, content, teaching methodology, and evaluation design. All programs were located in the United States. Outcome metrics and success of the programs was variably reported, with a mix of online and in person feedback used. The grey literature search revealed 3 American-based programs specifically catered to radiology residents, and none within Canada. Conclusion: The review highlighted a paucity of published literature describing leadership development efforts within radiology residency programs. The heterogeneity of programs highlighted the need for guidance from regulatory bodies regarding delivery of leadership curricula.

show abstract

“…In addition to adapting education delivery methods to meet the needs of millennials, it is imperative that radiology trainees be taught noninterpretative skills in quality, efficiency, and safety that will prepare them to be effective proponents of emerging value-driven care models (39).…”

Section: Impact Of Millennials In Radiologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Navigating Generational Differences in Radiology

Krishnaraj

Pesch

2018

RadioGraphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Generations are cohorts of individuals born in a particular time period who share similar values or value systems owing to historic events that occurred at crucial times during their development.Generations are defined to study how views and values change over time and to assess the differential impact that formative experiences have on groups. Understanding and navigating generational differences will be a critical skill for radiology leaders in the coming decade, as four distinct generations are working side by side for the first time in history. The four generations currently in the workforce are categorized as traditionalists, baby boomers, Generation Xers, and millennials. Beginning in 2016, millennials became the largest generation in the U.S. workforce, surpassing the number of Generation Xers. This major demographic shift will have a profound impact on workplace culture, recruitment efforts, and trainee education. While each generation has similar basic needs, meeting those needs and motivating individuals of different generations are best accomplished using different approaches. Radiology leaders must encourage and support these varied generations to work harmoniously to foster high-performance organizations. © RSNA, 2018 •

show abstract

Practice Management and Health Policy Education in Radiology: An Emerging Imperative

Cited by 12 publications

References 40 publications

<p>An Unmet Need in Healthcare Leadership: A Survey of Practicing Physicians’ Perspectives on Healthcare Delivery Science Education</p>

<p>An Unmet Need in Healthcare Leadership: A Survey of Practicing Physicians’ Perspectives on Healthcare Delivery Science Education</p>

Leadership Development Programs for Radiology Residents: A Literature Review

Navigating Generational Differences in Radiology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About