2022
DOI: 10.1080/1461670x.2022.2065339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical, Not Radical: Examining Innovative Learning Culture in a Public Service Media Organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…You are constantly afraid of something" [I3]. The development network, however, seemed essential in providing an arena for such aspirations across the organization and fostering a culture that allows for innovating and testing (Koivula et al, 2022):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…You are constantly afraid of something" [I3]. The development network, however, seemed essential in providing an arena for such aspirations across the organization and fostering a culture that allows for innovating and testing (Koivula et al, 2022):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the study’s adoption of the institutional logics perspective which allows the highlighting of diversity of experiences within a field. Furthermore, the study’s focus on learning instead of innovation merits a notion: while journalism innovation research often concludes that news organizations are incapable and/or unwilling to produce innovations and thus secure their future (see Koivula et al, 2022), less attention has been devoted to the mechanism through which this comes to be. Learning allows for the building of routines which make new learning more difficult to achieve (Edmondson and Moingeon, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changing skill demands have been well-documented in academic research on, for example, newsroom convergence and multiskilling (Bro et al, 2016; Nygren, 2014; Cottle and Ashton, 1999) as well as in studies on ideal skills for both professional journalists (Chew and Tandoc, 2022; Royal et al, 2020; Min and Fink, 2021) and students of journalism (Valencia-Forrester, 2020; Jaakkola, 2018; Mensing and Ryfe, 2013). Some studies have looked at the effects of newsroom culture on learning and innovation (Porcu, 2020; Porcu et al 2022; Koivula et al, 2022) and, relatedly, still others have examined the effects of mid-career training (Smith et al, 2022; Salzmann et al, 2021). These studies exemplify the amorphous nature of learning in journalism as an object of study: Learning has been examined from multiple viewpoints but studies that focus on the process of learning or its larger institutional context are rare.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Journalists, furthermore, usually dedicate their creative energies almost entirely to the execution of day-to-day activities (Koivula et al, 2020). A wealth of empirical research in the field of organisational studies has demonstrated that news media companies usually struggle to make space for exploratory activities, as they find it hard to balance daily media production and explorative innovation, an ability that has been labelled as ambidexterity (Koivula et al, 2022;Porcu, 2017). However, it is precisely through the enactment of explorative innovation practices that the potential for substantial value creation and financial rewards emerges.…”
Section: Explorative Innovation In Journalism As An Organisational En...mentioning
confidence: 99%