2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.05.979419
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Fluorescence Reconstruction Microscopy for Large Samples and Low-Magnification Imaging

Abstract: Fluorescence reconstruction microscopy (FRM) is an approach where transmitted light images are passed into a convolutional neural network which then outputs predicted epifluorescence images. This approach enables many benefits including reduced phototoxicity, freeing up of fluorescence channels, simplified sample preparation, and the ability to re-process legacy data for new insights. However, current FRM benchmarks are single scores that are difficult to relate to how useful for trustworthy and FRM predicitio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell density measurements. We first reproduced nuclei positions from 4× phasecontrast images using our in-house Fluorescence Reconstruction Microscopy tool 71 . The output of this neural network was then segmented in ImageJ to determine nuclei footprints and centroids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell density measurements. We first reproduced nuclei positions from 4× phasecontrast images using our in-house Fluorescence Reconstruction Microscopy tool 71 . The output of this neural network was then segmented in ImageJ to determine nuclei footprints and centroids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FUCCI system contains a period after M-phase where cells go dark, making FUCCI unreliable for cell counting. Instead, we developed and trained a convolutional neural network to reproduce nuclei from 4X phase contrast images using our in-house Fluorescence Reconstruction Microscopy tool ( LaChance and Cohen, 2020 ) . The output of this neural network was then segmented in ImageJ to determine nuclei footprints and centroids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the often cited weakness of these techniques is the lack of an intuitive explanation of which parts of the data are particularly meaningful in defining the extracted pattern. While in some applications, such as image segmentation, image restoration or mapping between imaging modalities, a well-validated outcome of a network has been satisfactory (Christiansen et al, 2018;Fang et al, 2019b;Guo et al, 2019;Hershko et al, 2019;Hollandi et al, 2019;LaChance and Cohen, 2020;Moen et al, 2019;Nehme et al, 2018;Ounkomol et al, 2018;Ouyang et al, 2018;Rivenson et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019;Weigert et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2019), there is increasing mistrust in results produced by 'black-box' neural networks. Aside from increasing the confidence, the analysis of the properties -also referred to as 'mechanisms'of the pattern recognition process can potentially generate insight of a biological/physical phenomenon that escapes the analysis driven by human intuition.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Latent Features Discriminating High and Lomentioning
confidence: 99%