2004
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.42.5.1863-1868.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Considerations in Design of Internal Amplification Controls for Diagnostic PCR Assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
350
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
350
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The competitive internal controls are suggested because the target virus RNA and IC RNA are amplified in the same RT-PCR condition. The approaches of how to generate such an IC RNA have been reviewed [81]. When using the competitive IC RNA, there are three possible outcomes of RT-PCR assays: (1) no product (the assay has failed-inhibition may be present); (2) the IC RNA, but not the virus fragment is obtained (the assay has worked, and the sample is most likely negative or viral RNA is below the detection limit); (3) the virus fragment, with or without the IC RNA fragment, is obtained (the assay has worked, and the sample is positive).…”
Section: Rt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competitive internal controls are suggested because the target virus RNA and IC RNA are amplified in the same RT-PCR condition. The approaches of how to generate such an IC RNA have been reviewed [81]. When using the competitive IC RNA, there are three possible outcomes of RT-PCR assays: (1) no product (the assay has failed-inhibition may be present); (2) the IC RNA, but not the virus fragment is obtained (the assay has worked, and the sample is most likely negative or viral RNA is below the detection limit); (3) the virus fragment, with or without the IC RNA fragment, is obtained (the assay has worked, and the sample is positive).…”
Section: Rt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the same amount of armored RNA was added to each sample, the initial amount of mcyE transcript can be determined. However, although the competitive strategy is currently the most accurate in quantifying nucleic acids, the competition between the target and standard for amplification components (e.g., primers, transcriptase, dNTPs, and polymerase) can, in some instances, result in the reduction of efficiency for one or both templates (Hoorfar et al 2004). To ensure that the standard does not suppress amplification of the target sequence and vice versa, we determined the lowest possible number of pseudoviral particles that can be added to an extraction sample without causing any kind of assay interference.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EAC approach is time-consuming and expensive as each sample is tested twice. An alternative approach is an IAC which is simultaneously amplified in the same reaction with the target nucleic acid (Hoorfar et al 2004). …”
Section: Sapoviruses Have Been Quantitatively Detected and Characterimentioning
confidence: 99%